Massachusetts Parole Board, 18 MCSR 216 (2005) Applicable Civil Service Law The authority to bypass a candidate for permanent appointment or promotion to a civil service position derives from G.L. c. 31, 27, which provides: If an appointing authority makes an original or promotion appointment from certification of any qualified person other than the qualified person whose name appears highest [on the certification], and the person whose name is highest
Massachusetts Parole Board, 18 MCSR 216 (2005). Applicable Civil Service Law G.L. c. 31, s. 2(b) authorizes appeals to the Commission by persons aggrieved by certain actions or inactions by the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD) or, in certain cases by appointing authorities to whom HRD has delegated its authority, and which actions have abridged their rights under civil service laws.
Massachusetts Parole Board, 18 MCSR 216 (2005). Accord Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles LLC, 451 Mass. 547, 550 n.6 (2008); Maimonides School v. Coles, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 240, 249 (2008). See also Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Company, 451 Mass. 623, 635-36 (2008) (discussing standard for deciding motions to dismiss); cf. R.J.A. v. K.A.V., 406 Mass. 698 (1990) (factual issues bearing on plaintiffs standing required denial of motion to dismiss).
Massachusetts Parole Board, 18 MCSR 216 (2005). Accord Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles LLC, 451 Mass. 547, 550 n.6 (2008); Maimonides School v. Coles, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 240, 249 (2008). See also Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Company, 451 Mass. 623, 635-36 (2008) (discussing standard for deciding motions to dismiss); cf. R.J.A. v. K.A.V., 406 Mass. 698 (1990) (factual issues bearing on plaintiffs standing required denial of motion to dismiss).
Massachusetts Parole Board, 18 MCSR 216 (2005). See also Mangino v. HRD, 27 MCSR 34 (2014) and cases cited (The notion underlying the summary decision process in administrative proceedings parallels the civil practice under Mass.R.Civ.P.56, namely, when no genuine issues of material fact exist, the agency is not required to conduct a meaningless hearing.); Morehouse v.
, 172(m) provides in pertinent part: Notwithstanding this section or chapter 66A, the following shall be public records: (1) police daily logs, arrest registers, or other similar records compiled chronologically; (2) chronologically maintained court records of public judicial proceedings; (3) published records of public court or administrative proceedings, and of public judicial administrative or legislative proceedings; and (4) decisions of the parole
, 172(m) provides in pertinent part: Notwithstanding this section or chapter 66A, the following shall be public records: (1) police daily logs, arrest registers, or other similar records compiled chronologically; (2) chronologically maintained court records of public judicial proceedings; (3) published records of public court or administrative proceedings, and of public judicial administrative or legislative proceedings; and (4) decisions of the parole
Massachusetts Parole Board, 18 MCSR 216 (2005). See also Mangino v. HRD, 27 MCSR 34 (2014) and cases cited (The notion underlying the summary decision process in administrative proceedings parallels the civil practice under Mass.R.Civ.P.56, namely, when no genuine issues of material fact exist, the agency is not required to conduct a meaningless hearing.); Morehouse v.
Massachusetts Parole Board, MCSR 216 (2005). cf. Milliken & Co., v. Duro Textiles LLC, 451 (2008); Maimonides 249, Iannacchino_yv. Ford School v. Coles, 71 Mass.App.Ct. Motor Company, 451 Mass. 623, 240, 635-36, Mass. 547, 550n.6, (2008). (2008) 18 See also (discussing standard for deciding motions to dismiss); cf. R.J.A. v.