The Appellant has been employed by the Massachusetts Department ofCorrection for the past two years. (Testimony of Appellant) 4. At the time he filed his application for employment with the Boston Police Department, he was employed at the Home Depot in West Roxbury. (Testimony of Appellant; Exhibit 9) 5. The Appellant took an open examination for the position of police officer. (Stipulated Fact) 2 6.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Department ofCorrections) and Robert Furtado 17 MLC 1293 (1990) (citing Trustees of Forbes Library v. Labor Relations Commission, 384 Mass. 559, 565 (1981)). In this case, the Union cannot demonstrate prongs (2), (3), or (4) above. As the facts make clear, Mr. Rowley had no knowledge of a Union organizing campaign until February 25, 2016, which was after he convened the employee meeting.
See Department ofCorrections v. McKee, 199 Wash. App. Ct. 635 (2017); City of Portage v. OGrady, 2019AP354 (Wisc. App. Ct., April 30, 2020). Moreover, the continuing harassment of Malden is already the subject of current and active litigation. See City of Malden v.
DECISION ON HRDS MOTION FOR SUMMARY DECISION On December 15, 2024, the Appellant, Denise Lazzara, a Correction Officer III (CO III) with the Department ofCorrection (DOC), appealed to the Civil Service Commission, pursuant to G.L. c. 31, 24, claiming that the DOC Captain Examination administered by the states Human Resources Division (HRD) was not a fair test as defined by G.L. c. 31, 22, 4, for a variety of 1 reasons.
Civil Service Commission and Department ofCorrection, Worcester Superior Court #2001-0180B (April 9, 2004); Tavares v. Civil Service Commission and Mass. Highway Department, Bristol Superior Court #B98-1383 (November 3, 1999); Cascino v. City of Boston, 28 MCSR 194 (2015); Mason v. Department ofCorrection, 28 MCSR 202 (2015); DeJesus v. Lowell, 27 MCSR 562 (2014); Lacet v. Boston Police Department, 21MCSR 154 (2008); Pike v.
Department ofCorrection, CSC Docket No.G1-08-53 (2008), and Anderson v Department of Correction, CSC Docket No.G1-08-106 (2008). The Appellant has honorably worn the uniform of his country as a United States Navy Petty Officer third Class, serving for four years before being honorably discharged. Although subject to drug screening throughout his naval career, there is no evidence that he tested positive for any illegal drugs.
LSH collaborates with the Massachusetts Department ofCorrection and the County Sheriffs to provide state and county inmates with high quality inpatient and outpatient care in a safe and secure setting. The hospital is staffed by numerous personnel in the medical field, including doctors, social workers, administrative assistance, and Registered Nurses (RN).
purposes of the project, 230 without further appropriation, in addition to the amounts appropriated in this item; provided 231 further, that all maintenance and repair work funded in this item shall be listed in the capital asset 232 management information system administered by the division of capital asset management and 233 maintenance; provided further, that costs payable from this item shall not include the design or 234 construction of new department
purposes of the project, 230 without further appropriation, in addition to the amounts appropriated in this item; provided 231 further, that all maintenance and repair work funded in this item shall be listed in the capital asset 232 management information system administered by the division of capital asset management and 233 maintenance; provided further, that costs payable from this item shall not include the design or 234 construction of new department