1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's bypass appeal for police officer as it was untimely, but reserved the right to consider issues raised in this appeal as part of a broader, ongoing investigation of the Methuen Police Department.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the appeal of a female Dedham police officer who was bypassed for promotion to Sergeant in favor of a male candidate, after finding that the promotional process was unlawfully influenced by a predisposition for the selected candidate and unjustified personal bias against the Appellant and an unr
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's bypass appeal as he is currently unable to obtain a license to carry a firearm, which is a uniformly enforced requirement to be appointed as a Boston police of
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's bypass appeal for Springfield police officer as she was unable to provide any evidence to show that she qualified for the residency preference, without which she was not reachable for consideration.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the Appellant's bypass appeal for Correction Officer I based on inconsistent answers provided to the Department of Correction during the hiring process.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission opted not to exercise its discretion to initiate an investigation as requested by the Petitioner for the reasons stated in the response.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the non-bypass equity appeal of the Appellant as his non-selection for Fire Lieutenant was not a bypass (tie) and an investigation by the Commission was not warranted.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission approved a joint request for relief based on the unique circumstances related to these appeals.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Civil Service Commission denied the Appellant’s appeal to be reclassified from Engineering Aide II to General Construction Inspector I as he failed to show that he performed the level distinguishing duties of the higher classification a majority of the time. Rather, he is a properly classified EA-II who has histori
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Civil Service Commission denied the Appellant’s appeal to be reclassified from Program Coordinator II to Program Coordinator III as she failed to show that she performed the level distinguishing duties of the higher classification a majority of the time.