lv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION 17. Name Educational Association of Worcester, Inc. 19. ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20.
Srednicki: Since the parties have executed a settlement agreement, the Educational Association of Worcester requests withdrawal of the charge filed in the above-referenced matter against the Worcester School Committee. A withdrawal form is enclosed. Thank you. Sincerely, Will Evans Direct Line: 617-878-8286 Email: wevans(@massteacher.org Enclosure ce: Len Zalauskas, President EAW Brad Brousseau, MTA Consultant Sean Sweeney, Esq.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. N. | INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY fe] 39, The Charging Party iis an Individual (0, Employee Organization (O), Employer : ce 40. Name NAGE, Local 207 a , 42. Telephone 41. Representative to contact James J. Dever, Esq.
Prior to March 2020, CSED LAs performed pretrial Case Conferencing, during which they would complete necessary case file documents and negotiate settlements. During this time, CSED Counsels were scheduled for Block Time, during which they review proposed settlements and litigate Probate and Family Court cases. 7.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS ' ) AFSCME, COUNCIL 93 | ) and | ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , DDS/ANF SUP 13-2851 ) ) ) _) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the parties desire to settle in an amicable manner all claims which have. arisen regarding the above Charge, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Developmental Services/ Administration and Finance (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent) and the American
Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04 (1) INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact AFSCME Council 93, Local 1368 Joseph DeLorey 20. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 8 Beacon St, Boston, MA 02108 23. The Charging Party is an: C1] Individual 21. Telephone Number 617-367-6024 22.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Southeastern Teachers Regional Federation Local School 1849, AFT District Committee and Massachusetts, AFL-CIO, Southeastern hereby Regional settle DLR Case No. 12-MUP-2095 as follows: 1. The Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed, with prejudice to re-filing, and the charge is withdrawn, with prejudice to re-filing. 2. The School Committee will pay Mr.
Yes No Note: the division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Representative to contact 17. Name Joseph R. Lettiere, Associate Southeastern Regional Teachers Federation, Local 1849, Counsel AFT Massachusetts, AFL-CIO 20 .
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Count IV of the Complaint is moot because the parties subsequently reached a contract settlement of their successor contract negotiations.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Count IV of the Complaint is moot because the parties subsequently reached a contract settlement of their successor contract negotiations.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
The Sergeants and Lieutenants rates of pay predicated as they are upon a differential factor shall not increase in any subsequent contract year as a result of an increase in the patrol officers rates for that year, unless and until: The City and the Association reach a full and final settlement in their collective bargaining negotiations for that year; or The Association is willing to accept as a full and final settlement the reached with the patrol
. | | jf | | WA CL Lorn purer wan ringfield School Committee an ield Education Association MUP-08-5378, MUP-09-5379: Settlement Dear Ms. Sullivan: JU CUSES Charles F. Hurley Building Boston, MA 02114 $ Dur | Division of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1 Floor fi 7pCa 2 C- zo | NC . our Ge Clean bos | 4 Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the Union hereby withdraws the charges in this | action. Thank you for your assistance.
On April 15, 2010, the Town and the Association had a scheduled arbitration hearing over a grievance filed by the Association related to a Lieutenant allegedly not being called for overtime in violation of the collective bargaining agreement. drafted Prior to the hearing, the parties engaged in settlement discussions, and ultimately a Memorandum of Agreement which was signed by then-Fire Chief Michael Howard (Chief Howard)', and Association President
The April 15, 2010 MOA stated in pertinent part: In full and final settlement of the Arbitration Case No. 07-2010 pending before the Division of Labor Relations, Local 1631, |.A.F.F. (Union) and the Town of Norwood (Town) hereby agree as follows: 1. The grievance set forth in the above-referenced matter is hereby settled by the parties.
They did so in settlement of a grievance related to officer overtime opportunities. (Testimony of President Quinn.) The MOA was signed by President Quinn and Chief Howard, and was to take effect on that date. JX-1 415. It states: The parties agree to incorporate this agreement into the collective bargaining agreement. /d. 14. It also states: The signatories to this Agreement are authorized to bind their ' The MOA ing.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
In January 2020, after years of litigation and a year of mediation, the Committee approved a settlement agreement with GE. The settlement agreement required GE to begin cleanup immediately and to ship the most highly contaminated waste material out of state, while allowing other waste with lower average concentrations of PCBs to be disposed of at a new waste facility in Berkshire County.
On December 17, 2009, the Feoffees filed a lawsuit against the Ipswich School Committee seeking, among other things, that "the Feoffees be permitted to sell the land known as Little Neck in Ipswich, Massachusetts on such terms as are set forth in a settlement agreement between the Feoffees and the [Little Neck Legal Action Committee]." 1 Following the court complaint, the Town of Ipswich passed an article at its May 11, 2010 Town Meeting to: Request