Rousseau appeared tied for 62 on Certification 00974 issued to DOC by the states Human Resources Division (HRD) on July 2, 2013. The DOC selected 182 applicants for appointment, 122 of whom were ranked below Mr. Rousseau. (Exh. 6). 3. On his application for employment, Mr.

The states Human Resources Division (HRD) established an eligible list on November 1, 2011. The City requested a Certification based on the eligible list to hire eighteen (18) candidates, and HRD created Certification No. 01170 on September 18, 2013. Mr. Ruggiero ranked twenty-fourth (24th) on the Certification among those willing to accept employment.

On April 28, 2006, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reasons: a) Ms. Crosby was terminated from an employment position with Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates in December of 2003; b) Ms. Crosby had previously been charged with Assault and Battery-Family Abuse and Disorderly 3 Person; and c) Ms.

Bowman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 30, s. 49, the Appellant, James Gingerelli (hereafter Appellant or Gingerelli), is appealing the July 11, 2007 decision of the Human Resources Division (HRD) denying his request for reclassification from the position of Engineering Aide II (EA II) to the position of General Construction Inspector 1 I (GCI I).

DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 30 49, the Appellant, Barbara Paparazzo (hereinafter Appellant) is appealing the October 23, 2009 decision of the Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) denying her request for reclassification from the position of Clerk IV to the position of Clerk V in the Center for Student Development, at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (hereinafter University).

As of September 14, 2016, the Town was a party to a Delegation Agreement with the state Human Resources Division (HRD) authorizing the Town to hire a vendor to conduct an assessment center to help the Town identify appropriate candidates for the Lieutenant promotion instead of asking HRD to conduct a written promotional exam. (R.Ex. 1)4 7.

otherwise agreed, no dD y circumstances. weekend, except in emergenc vacation or sick time unless, to make up a weekend due to Nurses shall not be required E. cause to believe that sick good has rity LK, an Appointing Autho pursuant to Article 8, Section de satisfactory medical d and the employee failed to provi leave on the weekend is being abuse evidence. 10 representatives selected by the Association and four (4) representatives designated by the Human

The states Human Resources Division provided information relevant to this appeal as part of the pre-hearing. The parties subsequently filed cross motions and a motion hearing was held on February 7, 2011 at which time I heard oral argument from both parties. Applicable Law, Rules and Policies Civil service jobs are divided into two categories, official service and labor service.

Stein DECISION The Appellant, Deanna Shine, appealed to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) pursuant to G.L.c.30,49, 1 from the denial of the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD) of a request to reclassify her position at the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC) from her current title of Office Support Specialist I (OSS-I) to the title of Program Coordinator II (PC-II).

FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the submissions of the parties and the states Human Resources Division (HRD), including all motions, responses thereto, documents, the Appellants affidavit, the parties prehearing conference stipulation and arguments at the motion hearing, and email messages regarding this case, I find that the following material facts are not in dispute: 1.