City of Cambridge, nom., Cambridge Police Superior Relations Commission, 47 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1999). it transfers work Officers prior notice and an 23 28, 36 MLC Association v.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 682 N.E.2d 923, 925 (1997), In this context, justification means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. 682 N.E.2d at 926, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Court of Eastern Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482, 160 N.E. 427 (1928).

City of Cambridge v, Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). Justified means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an. unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id, at 304.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). Justified means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Jd. at 304.

DOC CS-13-2; D-12-240 City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Comm'n,.43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304, 682 N.E.2d 923, 925 (1997). Reasonable justification means that the appointing authority's actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and correct rules of law. Commissioners of Civil Service v.

City of Cambridge y. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rule of law. Jd, at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service y.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mine, guided by common sense and by correct rule of law. Jd. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 3004 (1997). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rule of law. Id, at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of E Middlesex, 2262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

City of Cambridge, 43 Mass. App. at 304. BPDs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED, Roberts Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is ALLOWED, and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. December 30, 2009 Christine M. Roach

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). It is well settled that reasonable 7 justification requires that the Appointing Authoritys actions be based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind guided by common sense and correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928).