Reid Boswell, at Mount Auburn Hospital in Cambridge, MA, for a physical fitness-for-duty examination on September 27, 2016, and to Chandler Psychological Services (CPS) in Worcester, MA, for a psychological fitness-for-duty examination on October 4, 2016. See JX 5 and 9. Ms.

City of Cambridge, 7 MLC 2111, 2112 (1981). However, the NLRB has moved on from the Spielberg factors and adopted a new standard for determining whether to defer to an arbitration decision, See e.g. Bencli v. Nat'| Labor Relations Bd., 873 F.3d 1094, 1098 (Sth Cir. 2017).

Captain Dowling was sent by the Citys Department of Human Resources to the City Physician at Mount Auburn Hospital in Cambridge, MA for a physical examination on September 27, 2016, and to Chandler Psychological Services (CPS) in Worcester, MA for a psychological examination on October 4, 2016 and dates thereafter. CPS should be known to the NPSOA, as they perform all pre-employment psychological screenings for Police Department recruits. 3.

Widmer requested "all records relating to the investigation of the murder of Jane Britton in Cambridge MA on January 7, 1969." In a response dated January 30, 2018, the DAO denied access to records under Exemption (f) of the Public Records Law. G. L. c. 4, 7(26)(f). Previous appeals This request is similar to a previous request by Mr. Widmer.

Widmer requested "all records relating to the investigation of the murder of Jane Britton in Cambridge MA on January 7, 1969." In a response dated January 30, 2018, the DAO denied access to records under Exemption (f) of the Public Records Law. G. L. c. 4, 7(26)(f). Previous appeals This request is similar to a previous request by Mr. Widmer.

PD\UHVXOWLQWKHGLVPLVVDORIWKHFKDUJH 1RWH3XUVXDQWWR&05WKH'/5ZLOOQRWLVVXHDFRPSODLQWXQOHVVWKHFKDUJLQJSDUW\KDVFRPSOLHGZLWKWKHDSSOLFDEOHSURYLVLRQV RI0*/F(DQG (PSOR\HU City of Medford 5HSUHVHQWDWLYHWRFRQWDFW 7HOHSKRQH1XPEHU Jay Sullivan, Esq 617-758-8160 $GGUHVV VWUHHWDQG1RFLW\WRZQVWDWHDQG=,3FRGH )D[1XPEHU Sullivan and Reed LLP, 245 First Street, 18th Floor, Cambridge

Sullivan and Reed 245 First Street, 18th Floor Cambridge, MA 02142 Leah M. Barrault, Esq.

Nolan, Attorney for NEPBA, Inc., hereby certify that on this date, a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Charge was served upon-Heather Hall, Esquire, 40 Thorndike Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, by email. Dated: July 17, 2014 ary G. Nolan, Esq. BBO #634907 133 Merrimack Street Lowell, MA 01852 Tel. (978) 454-3800

Fax Number 40 Thorndike Street, Cambridge MA 02141 617-494-1755 6. Employee Organization (if any): NEPBA, Local 500 8. 7. Representative to contact 9. Telephone Number Gary G. Nolan, Esq 978-454-3800 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) c/o 133 Merrimack Street, Lowell, MA 01852 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12. 617-960-2800 10.

In so holding, citing City of Cambridge, 4 MLC 1044, 1050 (1977), the Hearing Officer found summary judgment to be appropriate because there were no genuine issues of material fact and the moving parties were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

City of Cambridge, 4 26 MLC 2/ moving parties may satisfy their burden of demonstrating the absence of a triable issue 28 either by submitting evidence that negates an essential element of the opposing partys 29 case 30 proving 31 Communications Corp., 410 Mass. 805, 809 (1991). 32 no genuine issues of material fact, | proceed to consider the merits of the parties cross- 33 motions. 1044, 1050 (1977).

These appeals are related to your public records requests to the City of Cambridge (Cambridge) and the City of Somerville (Somerville) for records related to residential parking permits. See SPRl 7/625 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (May 10, 2017); SPRl 7/626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (May 8, 2017).

On March 12, 2020, the City responded that it relies upon the existing record, including but not limited to any existing pleadings and communications already submitted by both the Attorney General [(AGO)], City of Cambridge and City of Somerville. To date, the City has declined to provide any additional information. In accordance with the Court's December 4, 2019 Order in City of Somerville v.

Civil Service Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006) and cases cited; City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also Commissioners of Civil Service v. Municipal Ct., 359 Mass. 211, 214 (1971); Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct., 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303-305, rev. den., 428 Mass. 1102 (1997).

Collins, 16 Mass.App Ct. 331,334, 1102, (1983). action is "justified" if "done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." 211, 214 (1971); Commissioners City of Cambridge of Civil Service v. Municipal v. Civil Service Commn, Ct., 359 Mass. 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997); Selectmen of Wakefield v.