12] 2/09 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts ciDecisionSete mate:Conm bsy CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA 02108 DANIEL P. McGRATH, Room 503 (617) 727-2293 Appellant v.

Decisi The Commenweatth of Masscchusettsci iled: 124109 serie Cxinissige CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA 02108 SILVIO C. TORRES, Room 503 (617) 727-2293 Appellant v.

.: G1-12-97 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission (Commission) voted at an executive session on April 4, 2013 to acknowledge receipt of the Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated January 23, 2013.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 DAVID G. BELANGER, Appellant v. G2-03-518 TOWN OF LUDLOW, Respondent Appellants Attorney: William J. Fennell, Esq. Fennell, Liquori & Powers 84 Park Street West Springfield, MA 01089 (413) 731-7655 wfennell@attysflp.com Respondents Attorney: Stanley L.

Days before the Appellant filed his appeal with the Civil Service Commission, he sent the Commission a copy of the letter he had sent to Mr. Thatcher in New Bedford in which he included 3 pages of information related to his leave and his health, as well as requested a hearing before the City of New Bedford. The above-entitled matter had a Pre-Hearing Conference at this Commission on March 30, 2006 at 11:30 AM.

.: G1-12-10 CITY OF METHUEN, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission (Commission) voted at an executive session on January 10, 2013 to acknowledge receipt of the Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated November 8, 2012. After careful review and consideration, the Commission voted to adopt the findings of fact and the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate therein.

.: G1-12-3 CITY OF WOBURN, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission (Commission) voted at an executive session on July 26, 2012 to acknowledge receipt of: 1) the Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Magistrate; 2) the Appellants Objections to the Recommended Decision; and 3) the Respondents Response to the Appellants Objections. To the extent that the City presented valid reasons for bypassing Mr.

A Full Hearing was held on November 28, 1 2005 at the offices of the Civil Service Commission. As no written notice was received from either party, the hearing was declared private. One tape was made of the hearing. Both parties submitted post-hearing briefs as instructed.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SUFFOLK, ss. BRUCE TAVARES, Appellant v. D-03-139 CITY OF FALL RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Austin M. Joyce, Esq. Reardon, Joyce & Akerson, P.C. 397 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 Respondents Attorney: Gary P. Howayeck, Esq. Special Assistant Corporation Counsel Law Department 1 Government Center Fall River, MA 02720 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr.

Civil Service Commission ofS COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SUFFOLK, ss. STEFAN H. BARNICKEL, Appellant v. G1-07-62 TOWN OF AGAWAM, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Pro Se Stefan Barnickel P.O. Box 771 Westfield, MA 01085 Kimberly L. Stevens Respondents Attorney: Assistant City Solicitor Town of Agawam 36 Main Street Agawam, MA 01001 Commissioner: . Daniel M.