Have not retired yet Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 2 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): I 40. Name James miele 42. Telephone Number 978-726-7410 41.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 2 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): I 40. Name James miele 42. Telephone Number 978-726-7410 41.
lv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 458 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION 17. Name Yarmouth Fire Fighters, Local 2122 19. ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Harold L.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
The parties have executed a settlement agreement. NEWTON FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 863, LAFF. _, Byfis its Asgorney, Attorney, L << SL YAS Paul T. Hynes, /Esq. ee id BBO No. 545952\ Angoff, Goldman, Manning, & Hynes, P.C. 100 River Ridge Dr., Suite 203 Norwood, MA 02062 (781) 255-7700 Dated: March 27, 2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |, Paul T.
unless reasonable settlement efforts have been Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). tor for settlement discussions. The Division may refer the charge to a Division media INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Employee Organization (O), |O 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employer (E): 41. Representative to contact 42. Telephone 40. Name Number |Paul T.
Singh, Samantha (DLR) From: Atwater, Susan (DLR) Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 2:16 PM To: Singh, Samantha (DLR) Subject: Closing 2 cases Hi Samantha, Please save the settlement email below into two cases, MUP-17-6415, City of Newton, and MUP-17-6418, City of Newton, and close them both out in time matters. I'll save the email in MUP-17-6414. Thank you. Susan Susan L. Atwater, Esq.
Colomb Ce: Subject: Efile DLR (EOL) RE: SPEA/Mansfield MUP-16-5403 Attachments: MUP-16-5403 Settlement Agreement {fully executed].pdf TimeMattersID: MAD40A72071D6841 Hi Jen: Attached, please find the fully executed settlement agreement in this matter. With this email, the Union hereby withdraws charge MUP-16-5403. Thanks, Jill Jillian M. Ryan, Esq. | 328s cee PY Sme Pyle Rome Ehrenberg PC Boston Northampton, Mass. Burlington, Vt.
Colomb Cc: jen.maldonado-ong@massmail.state.ma.us; efile.dlr@massmail.state.ma.us Subject: RE: SPEA/Mansfield MUP-16-5403 Hi Jen: We have a settlement agreement drafted and are in agreement on all terms. We expect the agreement to be fully executed by Monday and will forward a copy to you once it is all set.
Fa Yes [| No fait accompli Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04/17). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Southeastern Public Employees Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Jillian M, Ryan 617-367-7200 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
The parties are directed to bring individuals with settlement authority to the mediation, or have individuals with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled expedited hearing date. ARBITRATION: Pursuant to Chapter 151, Section 577 of the Acts of 1996, parties may submit the case to an impartial arbitrator, subject to the requirements set forth in that statute.
.: MUPL-16-5612 BROOKLINE EDUCATORS UNION and BROOKLINE SCHOOL COMMITTEE NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL Pursuant to the parties December 2017 Settlement Agreement the Brookline School Committee hereby withdraws MUP-16-5612 with prejudice. BROOKLINE SCHOOL COMMITTEE, By its attorney, /s/ Nicholas J. Dominello Nicholas J. Dominello Deutsch Williams Brooks DeRensis & Holland, P.C.
L] Yes LI] No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party, 456 CMR 15.04/1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Brookline School Committee 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Elizabeth Valerio 617-951-2300 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21. Fax Number 617-951-2323 1 Design Center Place, Boston, MA, 02210 22.
Gates Associate Counsel cc: Wendy Chu, Esq. 90 North Washington St 3" Floor Boston, MA 02114 WWW.MOSES-MA.ORG Telephone: (617) 367-2727 (800) 845-1141 Centrex (617) 727-9170 Fax (617) 367 9371 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS ) MASSACHSUETTS ORGANIZATION OF STATE ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS, Charging Party ) ) ) ) and ) SUP-14-3910 ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS (Department of Public Safety), Respondent } ) ) ) SETTLEMENT
16. ves VV) LI No 7 .04(1). been made by the charging party 456 CMR int unless reasonable seitlement efforts have Note: The Division may decline to issue a compla mediator for settlement discussions. The Division may refer the charge to a Divison INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 17. Mass. Organ. of State Engineers and Scientists 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Eric P.
It is also my position that the Union brokered a settlement with the Citys Labor Relations Department behind my back in an effort to create a new position that would benefit the Union. Attorney Magner admitted to meeting with the city to negotiate a settlement to keep the position within the Union and had discussions about how much I would get paid.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (QO), Employer (E): |! 40. Name 41. Representative to contact 42.
[| Yes No No, the Union is concerned that further retaliation will start once settlement discussions commence, Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15. 04/7). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name AFSCME Council 93 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.
No, the Union is concerned that further retaliation will start once settlement discussions commence. Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04 (1) INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact 21. Telephone Number AFSCME Council 93 Joseph DeLorey 617-367-6025 20. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 22.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing .
The Hearing Officer correctly determined that the Union, by agreeing to a settlement that reduced the Union Presidents discipline from a verbal warning to a counseling letter, did not waive its right to file an unfair labor practice charge alleging that the discipline interfered with employees Section 2 rights.
Leo. and Wallace Kisiel are Assistant a member of bargaining (11) The Executive Director caucused with his staff and agreed to Attorney DeLoreys settlement proposal, stating that he believed the point had been sufficiently made and that there was no need for the dispute to continue. On August 12, 2010, as part of a negotiated settlement (the terms of which were proposed by the union), Mr.
Thompsons discipline must be dismissed due to the Parties settlement of the matter as described above, the established legal authority used by the Hearing Officer in analyzing the Sanford letter was correct, as well as the authority in addressing this current challenge, and the Union has failed to establish an error of law on part of the Hearing Officer.
[Stipulated facts, Exhibit 4] (25) The Executive Director caucused with his staff and agreed to Attorney DeLoreys settlement proposal, stating that he believed the point had been sufficiently made and that there was no need for the dispute to continue. On August 12, 2010, as part of a negotiated settlement (the terms of which were proposed by the union), Mr. Thompsons verbal warning was reduced to a counseling memo.
ARTICLE.xxxJ:\T ...APPENDICES 78 ARTICLE XXXV SCOPE ANi) DURATION 79 APPENDIX A UNIT A POSITIONS 80 APPENDIX B UNIT A SALARY AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN, JULY 1, 1992 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1994 83 ~ APPENDIX C .PRIOR PRACTICES APPENDIX D REORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, WITH SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT (NO.2), AND SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT (NO.3) 90 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MIS) 1 02 APPENDIX E 87 APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H SETTLEMENT