On November 25, 2011, the City requested a certification from the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD). HRD furnished Certification No. 202581 to the City on December 23, 2011. Mr. Fopianos name appeared sixth (6th) on the certification among those willing to accept employment. The City appointed seventeen (17) candidates from the Certification, eight (8) of whom were ranked below Mr. Fopiano. (Stipulated Facts) 2. On December 27, 2011, Mr.
Her name appeared tied for 58th on Certification No. 00974 issued to DOC by the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) on July 2, 2013 from which DOC ultimately appointed one hundred eighty-two (182) candidates, 118 of whom were ranked below Ms. Marino. (Stipulated Facts) 12. As referenced above, DOC conducted a background investigation of Ms.
Shelton), pursuant to G.L. c. 31, 2(b), filed this appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting the decision of the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), to accept the reasons offered by the Respondent, Springfield Fire Department (City) as Appointing Authority for bypassing him for original appointment as a permanent, full-time firefighter.
RECOMMENDED DECISION The appellant, Gary Palmieri, appeals, under G.L. c. 30, 49, the decision of the Human ResourcesDivision to reallocate him from a Management Analyst II position to Program Coordinator II position, instead of promoting him to the Management Analyst ITT position that he had sought. I held a hearing on November 26, 2012, which I recorded digitally, at the Division of Administrative Law Appeals, One Congress Street, Boston. Mr.
Bowman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Anthony Allen (hereafter Allen or Appellant) seeks review of the Personnel Administrators (Human ResourcesDivision HRD) decision to accept the reasons of the Boston Police Department (hereafter Appointing Authority or BPD), bypassing him for original appointment to the position of police officer and removing him from consideration during the current two-year hiring cycle
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS On March 31, 2003, the Town of Brookline notified the states Human ResourcesDivision (hereinafter HRD) that is was bypassing the Appellant for original appointment as a police officer. The letter divided the reasons for bypassing the Appellant into three categories: residency, work history and responses to hypotheticals during his interview. HRD approved the Towns reasons for bypass.
On May 22, 2006, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reasons: a) In December 2002, the Appellant was terminated from a prior employer after an allegation of sexual harassment; and b) In November 2002, the Appellant was charged with a domestic assault and battery against his girlfriend, who is the mother of children.
Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Paul M. Stein DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS TO DISMISS The Appellant, Kevin Vaughn, acting pursuant to G.L.c.31, 2(b), asserts an appeal against the City of Boston (Boston) and the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD), challenging his bypass for selection to a position of Parking Meter Operations Foreman.
At hearings on July 7, 2009, October 6, 2009 and October 21, 2009, the Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) presented evidence through three witnesses, Michael Resca, Debra Antonelli, and Deborah Callinan, and the Appellant testified on her own behalf. 30 Exhibits, including an Affidavit of John Cronin, submitted in lieu of live testimony, were received in evidence. A digital recording was made of the hearing.
Henderson DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 30, 49, the Appellant, Margaret Emanuello (hereafter Appellant), is appealing the September 20, 2005 decision of the Human ResourcesDivision (hereafter HRD) denying her request for reclassification from the position of Clerk IV to the position of Administrative Secretary I. The Appellant is employed by the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth (hereafter University or Respondent).