City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification means the Appointing Authority's actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); Mclsaac v. 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E.
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).
City ofCambridge, 19 MCSR 299 (2006) (same). It might present a different case if, hypothetically, as a result of the bidding process, all Cafeteria Helper positions offered by the NBSD for bidding by the Appellant, in fact, went to more senior employees.
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997), Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331 (1983), McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995), Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411 (2000), City of Leominster y. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728 (2003).
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983). Mclsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995). Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000). City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission. 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). In order to show reasonable justification, the appointing authority must demonstrate that the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of the public service. School Committee of Brockton v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 486, 488 (1997).
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). Justified means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Jd, at 304.
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). Justified means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported Adam Bourgery G1-12-216 CS-12-556 by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Jd, at 304.
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification is defined as adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of East Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928) and Commissioners of Civil Service v.