Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 821-830 of 1500 in total
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Town of Ludlow Police Department 4/26/07
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification means the Appointing Authority's actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Department of Correction 8/14/08
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); Mclsaac v. 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Department of Correction 2/14/08
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Almeida, Paul v. New Bedford Public Schools 10/21/10
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge, 19 MCSR 299 (2006) (same). It might present a different case if, hypothetically, as a result of the bidding process, all Cafeteria Helper positions offered by the NBSD for bidding by the Appellant, in fact, went to more senior employees.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Department of Mental Health 6/19/08
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997), Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331 (1983), McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995), Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411 (2000), City of Leominster y. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728 (2003).
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Department of Revenue 11/02/06
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983). Mclsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995). Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000). City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).
Civil Service Commission Decisions
City of New Bedford 12/7/06
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission. 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). In order to show reasonable justification, the appointing authority must demonstrate that the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of the public service. School Committee of Brockton v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 486, 488 (1997).
Civil Service Commission Decisions
City of Methuen 1/10/13
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). Justified means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Jd, at 304.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Department of Correction 2/7/13
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 303 (1997). Justified means done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported Adam Bourgery G1-12-216 CS-12-556 by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Jd, at 304.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
City of Woburn 7/26/12
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification is defined as adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of East Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928) and Commissioners of Civil Service v.
Displaying items 821-830 of 1500 in total