Municipal Ct., 359 Mass. 211, 214 (1971); City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997); Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct., 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). The Commission determines justification for discipline by inquiring, "whether the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of public service."

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, rev.den., 390 Mass. 1102 (1983).

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v.

City of Cambridge vs. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass.App.Ct.300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification means the Appointing Authoritys actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct, of E. Middlesex 262 Mass, 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service vs.

E.g., City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 303-305, 682 N.E.2d 923, rev.den., 428 Mass. 1102, 687 N.E.2d 642 (1997). See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728, 792 N.E.2d 711, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108, 799 N.E.2d 594 (2003); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, 721 N.E.2d 928, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v.

.); City of Cambridge, 23 MLC 28, 36 (1996), aff'd sub nom. Cambridge Police Superior Officers Assocn v. Labor Relations Commission, 47 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1999). Investigator Sullivan completely ignores this well-settled principle and therefore her partial dismissal must be reversed.

Alleged Transfer of Unit Work A public employer violates Section 10(a)(5) of the Law when it transfers work performed by bargaining unit members to non-bargaining unit personnel without giving its employees exclusive collective bargaining representative opportunity to bargain to resolution or impasse. (1996); affd sub nom., Cambridge prior notice and City of Cambridge, 23 MLC 28, 36 Police Superior Relations Commission, 47 Mass. App.

A r MAR 2.3 2018 ||} | ik Total By rn en Approved by (Original signature required): 18102637 fee ene ae e ee ere Holts + Org/Object/(Project Code if applicable); :- 00. 3/22/201 sciUeekanetDettop Ve LRak ARO MORAN FABLE IO TIEN RUT ANT PROMOS NERS Total $= Hours: inf Atenas cla dos hat, $29.00 ee Bue adm cree ey Toone 602s 1516 ee Smith Center eb Daly Welcome Smith Center wage Cambridge MA Holyoke Str.

References ( RFR Section 3.1.6) Reference 1 Name: Jane Sulkin Organization: Harvard University Address: Otis Street Cambridge MA Telephone number: (617) 496-1260 email: jane_sulkin@harvard.edu Above reference enrolled in Microsoft Select Microsoft Academic Select Microsoft Adobe Buying Program for Education Other Adobe volume-based Enterprise Agreement None of the above licensing program Reference 2 Name: Amanda Jones Organization: NERCOMP Consortium

Fax Number 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 6. Employee Organization (if any): Teamsters Local 25 8. 7. Representative to contact 9. Telephone Number Joan Corey 617-241-8831 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 544 Main Street, Boston, MA 10. Fax Number 02129 617-242-4284 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12.

, MA 02140 Suresh Chetty Patricia B.