Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 791-800 of 933 in total
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Swartz, Thomas v. Bourne Fire Department 7/29/21
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of New Bedford, 29 MCSR 471 (2016) (honest 19 mistakes in answering ambiguous questions on NBPD Personal History Questionnaire); Morley v. Boston Police Dept, CSC No. G1-16-096, 29 MCSR 456 (2016) (candidate unlawfully bypassed on misunderstanding appellants responses about his combat experience); Lucas v. Boston Police Dept, 25 MCSR 420 (2012) (mistake about appellants characterization of past medical history).
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Meuse, Gerald v. Everett Fire Department 7/14/22
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of New Bedford, 32 MCSR 128 (2019). An employer may ask a candidate about a specific matter which came to the employers attention through an independent lawful source other than the candidate. However, no employer may directly or indirectly, ask a candidate for employment to disclose information about prohibited matters contained within G.L. c. 151B, 4 and may not penalize him or her for answering such a prohibited inquiry. Compare Kraft v.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
City of Quincy 5/18/23
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of New Bedford, 29 MCSR 471 (2016); Morley v. Boston Police Dept, 29 MCSR 456 (2016); Lucas v. Boston Police Dept, 25 MCSR 420 (2012) (mistake about appellants characterization of past medical history). ANALYSIS Quincy did not meet its burden to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the reasons it offered for bypassing the Appellant for a second time in 2022 were reasonably justified.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Town of North Attleborough 5/30/24
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
City of New Bedford, 29 MCSR 471 (2016) (honest mistakes in answering ambiguous questions on application); Morley v. Boston Police Dept, CSC No. G1-16-096, 29 MCSR 456 (2016) (candidate unlawfully bypassed on misunderstanding appellants responses about his combat experience); Lucas v. Boston Police Dept, 25 MCSR 420 (2012) (mistake about appellants characterization of past medical history).
1 document · · Attorney General's Office · No Violation
Crotty & Associates, PLLC 5 Dover Street, Suite 102 New Bedford, MA 02740 By e-mail only: RE: Open Meeting Law Complaints Dear Attorney Crotty: This office received 14 complaints on August 5, 2020, one complaint on October 6, 2020, and three complaints on October 14, 2020, from Amy Singelais alleging that the Fairhaven Board of Health (the Board) violated the Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, 18-25.1 The first 14 complaints were originally filed with
3 documents · · Newton, MA · Fulfilled
Sincerely, Zach Midwood 307 Inspectional Central Ave, Services New Bedford, MA 02745 zachmidwood@gmail.com (508) 207-5351 Zach Midwood New Bedford MA 02745 Whaling City Home Solutions A list of all property address that have experienced fire damage or has had the fire department go to the property due to an emergency call.
3 documents · · City of Greenfield · Fulfilled
Locations: Boston Vet Center 665 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215(617) 424-0665 Brockton Vet Center1041L Pearl Street, Brockton, MA 02301(508) 580-2730 Hyannis Vet Center 474 West Main Street, Barnstable, MA 02601(508) 778-012416 Lowell Vet Center 73 East Merrimack Street, Lowell, MA 08152(978) 453-1151 New Bedford Vet Center 468 North Street, New Bedford, MA 02740(508) 999-6920 Springfield Vet Center 1985 Main Street, Springfield, MA 01103(413) 737
7 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
City of New Bedford, 38 MLC 117 (2011), the Massachusetts Labor Commission found that the employer did not repudiate an executed agreement by laying off certain employees as a result of subsequent local aid cuts pursuant to M.G.L.c. 29, Section 9(c). 14 instant case, the Department negotiated with an open and fair mind and compromised with the Union, demonstrating a sincere intent and purpose reach an agreement.
See also City of 5 The DOC cited City of New Bedford, 38 MLC 117, MUP-09-5581, MUP-09-5599 (2011) (H.O. decision), affd, 38 MLC 239 (2012), stating that the Board found that the employer did not repudiate an executed agreement by laying off certain employees as a result of subsequent local aid cuts pursuant to M.G.L. c. 29, Section 9(c).
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Boston Teachers Union Local 66 / Boston School Committee
8 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
City of Gardner, 10 MLC 1218 (1983); City of New Bedford, 14 MLC 1550 (1988).
See Lowell School Committee, 28 MLC 29, 32, MUP-2074 (June 22, 2001) (citing City of New Bedford, 15 MLC 1732, 1739, MUP-6488 (May 31, 1982)); City of Cambridge, 23 MLC 28, 36, MUP-9171 (June 28, 1996) aff'd sub nom. Police Superior Officers Association v. Labor Relations Commission, 1108 (1999); Cf., Chief Justice for the Administration Court v. Commonwealth and Cambridge 47 Mass. App. Ct.
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
One City Hall Square Appellants Attorney: 628 Pleasant St., 4th Floor New Bedford, MA 02740 Appointing Authoritys Attorney: Peter J. Berry, Esq. Robert M. Spiegel, Esq. Deutsch Williams Brooks DeRensis & Holland P.C.
Displaying items 791-800 of 933 in total