Nokham Law Office 350 Park Street: Unit 105 North Reading, MA 01864 Respondents Attorney: Maria Sheehy, Esq. City of Lowell Law Department City Hall 375 Merrimack Street: 3rd Floor Lowell, MA 01852 Commissioner: Christopher C.
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44 (1995). CONCLUSION Accordingly, for the reasons stated, the appeal of the Appellant, Beverly J. Freeman, in Appeal D-17-129 is dismissed and the one-day suspension is affirmed. Civil Service Commission /s/ Paul M. Stein Paul M. Stein Commissioner By vote of the Civil Service Commission (Bowman, Chairman; Camuso [Absent], Ittleman, Stein & Tivnan, Commissioners) on January 3, 2018. .
Town ofNorthReading, for de novo process); fact finding Bielawksi_y. 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, by a disinterested Personnel Adminr, 422 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need Commissioner in context of procedural Mass. 663 N.E.2d 459, 466, 821, 827 due (1996) (same) An action is justified if it is "done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding by a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v.
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding by a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v.
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding before a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v.
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding before a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v.
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding by a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v. Personnel Adminr, 422 Mass. 459, 466 (1996) (same) An action is justified if it is "done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law."
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding by a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v.
Town ofNorthReading, 8 MCSR 44, reconsidd, 8 MCSR 53 (1995) (discussing need for de novo fact finding before a disinterested Commissioner in context of procedural due process); Bielawksi v.