From 2003 to 2007, the selected candidate served as a detective where he was assigned to the Family Services Unit, conducting investigations of sexual assaults, domestic violence, hate crimes and maintaining the sex offender registry. (Exhibit 10) 26. In 2011, the selected candidate was promoted to Sergeant-Detective, at which time he assumed the position of the Family Services Unit Supervisor. (Exhibit 10) 27.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 459 Mass. 603 (2011); Costa v. Fall River Housing Auth., 453 Mass. 614, 627 (2009). It is the purview of the hearing officer to determine credibility of testimony presented to the Commission. [T]he assessing of the credibility of witnesses is a preserve of the [Commission] upon which a court conducting judicial review treads with great reluctance. E.g., Leominster v.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Employees, who have been assigned to detectives, or who perform administrative duties such as, but not limited to; Juvenile Officer, Identification Officer, Prosecuting Officer, Detail Officer, 911 Coordinator, Cruiser Maintenance Officer, Sex Offender Registry Manager, Breathalyzer Supervisor, Infectious Disease Officer, CJIS Representative, shall receive, in addition to his or her regular weekly pay, a differential of $600.00 per annum.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 459 Mass. 603 (2011); Costa v. Fall River Housing Auth., 453 Mass. 614, 627 (2009). It is the purview of the hearing officer to determine credibility of testimony presented to the Commission. [T]he assessing of the credibility of witnesses is a preserve of the [Commission] upon which a court conducting judicial review treads with great reluctance. Leominster v.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 459 Mass. 603 (2011); Costa v. Fall River Housing Auth., 453 Mass. 614, 627 (2009). The hearing officer determines the credibility of witnesses. Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 729 (2003) See also Covell v. Dept of Social Services, 439 Mass. 766, 787 (2003); Embers of Salisbury, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commn, 401 Mass. 526, 529 (1988); Doherty v.

Sex Offender Registry Bd., 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined 13 with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.