The states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) subsequently filed an Opposition to the Motion for Reconsideration. The Motion for Reconsideration failed to identify a clerical or mechanical error in the decision or a significant factor the Commission may have overlooked in deciding the case. Therefore, the Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Civil Service Commission DonaldR.
Since no notice was received from either party, the hearing was declared private. g FINDINGS OF FACT: Based on the documents entered into evidence (Exhibits 1-7), a packet submitted by the Human ResourcesDivision (hereinafter HRD) and the testimony of Edward Callahan, former Director of Human Resources for the Department, Deputy Superintendent Norman Hill, Commander of Recruit Investigations; and the Appellant, I make the following findings of facts
Copies of any and all documents, reports, videos, emails, and notes or other written documentation or correspondence of any kind between the University (and/or an agent of the University) and the Human ResourcesDivision(HRD) and Dr. Michael Brezsnyak regarding a temporary leave of absence for Officer Varosky from the position of Police Officer within the Umass Police Department. 3.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, BOSTON, MA 02108 DEVAL L. PATRICK Governor TIMOTHY JAY GONZALEZ Secretary PAUL DIETL P. MURRAY Lieutenant Governor Chief Human VIA HAND DELIVERY January 18, 2013 Edward B. Srednicki, Executive Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1*' Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: MOSES y.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, BOSTON, MA 02108 DEVAL L. PATRICK Governor JAY GONZALEZ Secretary TIMOTHY P. MURRAY Lieutenant Governor PAUL DIETL Chief Human Resources Officer VIA HAND DELIVERY November 27, 2012 Edward B.
In January 1995, the Massachusetts Department of Personnel Administration, now the Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Haverhill by which HRD delegated to Haverhill, among other things, certain functions related to the hiring of clerical civil service personnel. The MOA remained in effect throughout the period involved in this appeal. (Exh.34; Testimony of Carrington) 2.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 878-9888 Ashlee.Logan@mass.gov 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 27, 2022, I hereby caused a true and complete copy of the foregoing Answer to be served by email on Counsel for the Union, Araba Adjei-Koranteng, Esquire. __________________________ Ashlee N.
Firm/Organization Name Human ResourcesDivision EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (if any) 17. Name NAGE Unit 1 (Local 292) 18. Telephone Number 617-376-0220 1 19,20,21,22. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 159 Burgin Parkway Quincy MA 02169 23. FAX Number 617-376-0285 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 24. Name Araba Adjei-Koranteng 25. Telephone Number 671-376-7275 26,27,28,29.
Logan Labor Counsel Human ResourcesDivision 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 Date: November 16, 2022 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on November 15, 2022, I provided a copy of this response and all attachments to Union Counsel, , Esq. by email. ____________________________ Ashlee N. Logan 10
ORDER Pursuant to the powers of relief inherent in Chapter 534 of the Acts of 1976 as amended by Chapter 310 of the Acts of 1993, the Civil Service Commission directs the Human ResourcesDivision or the City of Newton in its delegated capacity to place the Appellants name at the top of the next certification for the position of full time permanent Fire Captain until such time as the Appellant receives at least one consideration for the position of
The Commission also received documentation from the Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) containing information regarding the Appellants civil service history. 1 The Commission previously decided a separate issue involving the Appellants eligibility to take a promotional examination for Fire Captain. See Jordan v.
Bowman DECISION On August 22, 2019, the Appellant, Christopher Lee (Appellant), pursuant to G.L. c. 30, 49, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting the decision of the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), in which HRD affirmed MassDOTs denial of his request to be reclassified from Civil Engineer II (CE II) to Civil Engineer III (CE III). On August 8, 2020, I held a remote pre-hearing conference.
Naik (Appellant), pursuant to G.L. c. 30, 49, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting the decision of the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), in which HRD affirmed the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT)s denial of his request to be reclassified from Civil Engineer IV (CE IV) to Civil Engineer V (CE V). On September 1, 2020, I held a remote prehearing conference.