Town of Stoughton, Massachusetts, 8 MLC 19 MLC 1149, 1158 (1992)(citing Commonwealth of 1499, 1512 (1981)); see also, City of New Bedford, 38 MLC 239, 250 (in unilateral change analysis, the Board held that the parties were not at impasse even after the union had filed a Section 9 mediation petition).

City of New Bedford, 29 MCSR --(2016) (honest mistakes in answering ambiguous questions on NBPD Personal History Questionnaire); Morley v. Boston Police Dept, CSC No. G1-16-096, 29 MCSR --- (2016) (candidate unlawfully bypassed on misunderstanding appellants responses about his combat experience); Lucas v.

Box 973 New Bedford, MA 02740 Dear District Attorney Quinn, I have received the petition of Todd Wallack of The Boston Globe seeking further consideration of my previous written determination regarding the Office of the District Attorney -Plymouth District's (DAO) response to a request for public records. See SPR15/185, et al. Determination ofthe Supervisor ofRecords (December 31, 2015). Specifically, Mr.

Town of Stoneham and Stoneham Police Association, Local 266, MCOP, MUP-095606, 19 MLC 1345, 1349 (1992) (transfer of bargaining unit work to civilian dispatchers mandatorily bargainable); City of New Bedford and New Bedford Police Union, 15 MLC 1732, 1736 (1989) (transfer to work in police departments records and communications rooms to police cadets mandatorily bargainable); Town of Norwell and Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 2700, 13 MLC 1200

Requirement For Service Upon Return Prior to the granting of the sabbatical leave, the professional employee shall enter into a written agreement with the Superintendent that, upon the termination of such leave, he/she will return to service in the New Bedford Public Schools for a period equal to twice the length of the sabbatical leave, and that, in default of completing such service, he/she will refund the City of New Bedford an amount equal to

City of New Bedford, 32 MCSR 128 (2019). An employer may ask a candidate about a specific matter which came to the employers attention through an independent lawful source other than the candidate. However, no employer may directly or indirectly, ask a candidate for employment to disclose information about prohibited matters contained within G.L. c. 151B, 4 and may not penalize him or her for answering such a prohibited inquiry. Compare Kraft v.

City of New Bedford, 29 MCSR 471 (2016); Morley v. Boston Police Dept, 29 MCSR 456 (2016); Lucas v. Boston Police Dept, 25 MCSR 420 (2012) (mistake about appellants characterization of past medical history). ANALYSIS Quincy did not meet its burden to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the reasons it offered for bypassing the Appellant for a second time in 2022 were reasonably justified.

City of New Bedford, 11 MCSR 202 (1998); Crimlisku v. Waltham School Department,10 MCSR 141 (1997); and Ratta v. City of Watertown, 18 MCSR 150 (2005). G.L. c. 31, section 43 also vests the Commission with some discretion to affirm, vacate or modify the discipline imposed by an appointing authority, although that discretion is not without bounds and requires sound and reasoned explanation for doing so. See Police Commr v.

City of New Bedford, 29 MCSR 471 (2016) (honest 19 mistakes in answering ambiguous questions on NBPD Personal History Questionnaire); Morley v. Boston Police Dept, CSC No. G1-16-096, 29 MCSR 456 (2016) (candidate unlawfully bypassed on misunderstanding appellants responses about his combat experience); Lucas v. Boston Police Dept, 25 MCSR 420 (2012) (mistake about appellants characterization of past medical history).

City of New Bedford, The idea 22 MCSR 568, 573 (2009) citing Llampallas v Mini Circuits Lab, Inc., 163 F.3d 1236, 1249 (11 Cir. 1998), cert.den., 120 S.Ct. 327, 145 L.Ed.2d 255 (1998); Willis v. Marion County Auditor's Office, 118 F.3d 547 (7* Cir. 1997) and cases cited; Shager v.