iNote: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 'Y] INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39, The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): O 40. Name 41. Representative to (42.
The parties have reached a settlement. Howard Lenow Sent from my iPad > On Apr 22, 2014, at 9:31 AM, "Kelley, Gwenn (DLR)" wrote: > > Please see the attached notice from the Department of Labor Relations (DLR) regarding the above-refe renced case. > > Effective September 9, 2013, the DLR began using electronic communication as the primary means of communication with the parties.
The Union and the Employer engaged in settlement discussions in an effort to resolve the matter without resort to further litigation. These discussions were not successful. The Employer indicated, during those discussions, that they would not be willing to reinstate Mr. LeBlanc until such time as he had a valid CDL. Mr. LeBlanc did not have a valid CDL at the time of his lay off.
No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 456 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Marlborough Public Works Equipment Operators Association 19. 20. Representative to contact 508-485-6600 Allison J. Zimmon 21.
Hurley Building 19 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 1st Floor 02114 Re: Marlborough Public Works Equipment Operators Association and City of Marlborough DLR Case #MUP-19-7520 Dear Director Roberts: On behalf of the Marlborough Public Works Equipment Operators Association, the Charging Party, I request withdrawal of the charge filed in the above-referenced matter pursuant to its settlement. Thank you. Very truly yours, Allison J.
There is no settlement beyond the provision of the requested information that would allow the Union to adequately prepare for the arbitration to which the information is relevant. Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39.
] Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Teamsters Local 25 Luke Liacos (Attorney) 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Good Morning: Pursuant to a settlement agreement, Teamsters Local 25 hereby withdraws the following pending charges of unfair labor practice: MUP-21-8877 MUP-21-8962 MUP-22-9038 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Luke Liacos, Esq. Feinberg, Dumont & Brennan 177 Milk Street Boston, MA 02109 lgl@fdb-law.com
lV Yes |_| No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number IBEW Local 486 Steven Fonseca (Attorney) 617-338-1976 19.
All: In light of a negotiated settlement between the parties, IBEW L. 486 hereby withdraws the above-referenced charge. If you have any questions, let me know. BPS ________________________ Brian P. Senier Feinberg, Dumont & Brennan 177 Milk Street, Suite 300 Boston, MA 02109 Office: (617) 338-1976 Cell: (781) 296-3202 bps@fdb-law.com This email and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged.
Copies of all Appellate Tax Board settlement agreements since January 1, 2020 for commercial property owners in New Bedford[;] [2.] A tally of all Appellate Tax Board settlement agreements since January 1, 2020 for residential property owners in New Bedford[.] On December 11, 2023, Ms. Ferguson appeared to modify her request and stated, ... is there a way we could narrow this request?
Vv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Greenfield Education Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT Greenfield Education Association (GEA) and the Greenfield School Committee (GSC) have reached a settlement agreement resolving the issues raised in the unfair labor practice complaint issued by the Department 31, 2015. Accordingly, GEA withdraws of Labor Relations (DLR) on July its charge in the above-captioned matter and requests that the DLR dismiss the Complaint with prejudice.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 2.
No Yes L] settlement talks futile BPS has already unilaterally implemented the new requirements, rendering efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless Teasonable settlement The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. ON CHARGING INFORMATION 17. Name Boston Teachers Union 79. PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20.
MJE/ Enclosure F:\BTU\Para ABA Training\ltrs\06.27. 13srednickidismiss.docx Boston Teachers Union, Charging Party MUP-13-2554 Respondent wee Boston School Committee, ve ve ve and wv vevrvr COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS CHARGING PARTYS WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGE In accordance with the terms of a duly executed settlement agreement, Charging Party Boston Teachers Union hereby withdraws the above-captioned charge of prohibited
Settlement Talks Are Not Futile, Upon receipt of the charge, thc Committee contacted the BTU and raised a resolution, but to date there has been no response. Consequently the: representation that settlement talks would be futile is nonsensical. CONCI.USION Wherefore, the Committee respectfully rex [uests the Commission not issue a complaint , and to dismiss the Charge with prejudice.
These documents relate to a 2005 discipline where a settlement was ultimately reached between the parties. That settlement agreement is admitted into evidence as A.A.-4E. Similarly, Exhibits A.A.-5B, A.A.-5C, and A.A.-5D were not admitted as they relate to a 2005 discipline that was ultimately decided by an arbitrator. The 2005 decision of the arbitrator, A.A.5E, was admitted into evidence, but not the supporting documentation.