No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 456 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Marlborough Public Works Equipment Operators Association 19. 20. Representative to contact 508-485-6600 Allison J. Zimmon 21.
Hurley Building 19 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 1st Floor 02114 Re: Marlborough Public Works Equipment Operators Association and City of Marlborough DLR Case #MUP-19-7520 Dear Director Roberts: On behalf of the Marlborough Public Works Equipment Operators Association, the Charging Party, I request withdrawal of the charge filed in the above-referenced matter pursuant to its settlement. Thank you. Very truly yours, Allison J.
Please note: failure to allege specific facts may/will result in dismissal of the charge. part, On or about June 23, 2011, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement which provided, in relevant the of ing understand the reflect would that the parties would execute a Memorandum of Agreement that 24, parties with respect to the assignment of officers to inmates for hospital coverage.
Employer's improper acts have made settlement impossible. 456 CMR 15.04/71). Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party discussions. settlement for mediator The Division may refer the charge to a Divison INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number SEIU, Local 509 Katherine D. Shea, Esq. 617-367-7200 17. 19. 21.
No Yes Employer's improper acts have made settlement impossible. Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(17). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 19. Representative to contact 21. Telephone Number SEIU, Local 509 Katherine D. Shea, Esq. 617-367-7200 18. 20. 22.
4 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement of Settlement is made this 10" day of February, 2014, by and between the City of Lowell (the City) and AFSCME, Council 93 (the Union), and the aforesaid agreement has been reviewed and is agreed to by Stephen Pickard (S. Pickard), the grievant. WHEREAS, S&S. Pickard worked for the City from February, 2012, to September, 2012, in the Citys Department of Public Works; and WHEREAS, S.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (0), Employer lo : (E): 40. Name a1, Representative to contact Boston Teachers Union Haidee Morris ee ; _ 42.
RE: MUP-20-8262 Boston Teachers Union and Boston School Committee Dear Hearing Officer Katany The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Therefore the Boston Teachers Union hereby withdraws its charges in MUP-20-8262, referenced above, and there is no need to go forward with an investigation this morning.
Copies of all Appellate Tax Board settlement agreements since January 1, 2020 for commercial property owners in New Bedford[;] [2.] A tally of all Appellate Tax Board settlement agreements since January 1, 2020 for residential property owners in New Bedford[.] On December 11, 2023, Ms. Ferguson appeared to modify her request and stated, ... is there a way we could narrow this request?
These documents relate to a 2005 discipline where a settlement was ultimately reached between the parties. That settlement agreement is admitted into evidence as A.A.-4E. Similarly, Exhibits A.A.-5B, A.A.-5C, and A.A.-5D were not admitted as they relate to a 2005 discipline that was ultimately decided by an arbitrator. The 2005 decision of the arbitrator, A.A.5E, was admitted into evidence, but not the supporting documentation.
Vv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Greenfield Education Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT Greenfield Education Association (GEA) and the Greenfield School Committee (GSC) have reached a settlement agreement resolving the issues raised in the unfair labor practice complaint issued by the Department 31, 2015. Accordingly, GEA withdraws of Labor Relations (DLR) on July its charge in the above-captioned matter and requests that the DLR dismiss the Complaint with prejudice.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 2.
No Yes L] settlement talks futile BPS has already unilaterally implemented the new requirements, rendering efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless Teasonable settlement The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. ON CHARGING INFORMATION 17. Name Boston Teachers Union 79. PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20.
MJE/ Enclosure F:\BTU\Para ABA Training\ltrs\06.27. 13srednickidismiss.docx Boston Teachers Union, Charging Party MUP-13-2554 Respondent wee Boston School Committee, ve ve ve and wv vevrvr COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS CHARGING PARTYS WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGE In accordance with the terms of a duly executed settlement agreement, Charging Party Boston Teachers Union hereby withdraws the above-captioned charge of prohibited
Settlement Talks Are Not Futile, Upon receipt of the charge, thc Committee contacted the BTU and raised a resolution, but to date there has been no response. Consequently the: representation that settlement talks would be futile is nonsensical. CONCI.USION Wherefore, the Committee respectfully rex [uests the Commission not issue a complaint , and to dismiss the Charge with prejudice.