Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place HRDs Attorney: Boston MA, 02108 Paul M. Stein! Commissioner: DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, John Alves, (hereinafter, Mr.

On October 31, 2005, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reason: In November of 1994, Mr. Croteau had a one-year restraining order (209A) taken out on him by his ex-girlfriend. (Exhibit 1) 1994 Restraining Order 9. Exhibit 2 is a copy of the 1994 restraining order and application against the Appellant. (Exhibit 2) 10.

On September 7, 2004, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reasons: a) On March 1, 1993, Mr. Nahim was criminally charged with Assault and Battery upon his then-girlfriend. According to the incident report, his then-girlfriend indicated that Mr.

Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Paul M. Stein DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY DECISION The Appellant, Debra Olufemi, acting pursuant to G.L.c.31, 2(b), asserts an appeal against the Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD), challenging her bypass for provisional promotion to Tax Examiner III. DOR and HRD moved for Summary Decision.

The states Human Resources Division (HRD) subsequently filed an Opposition to the Motion for Reconsideration. The Motion for Reconsideration failed to identify a clerical or mechanical error in the decision or a significant factor the Commission may have overlooked in deciding the case. Therefore, the Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Civil Service Commission DonaldR.

Since no notice was received from either party, the hearing was declared private. g FINDINGS OF FACT: Based on the documents entered into evidence (Exhibits 1-7), a packet submitted by the Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) and the testimony of Edward Callahan, former Director of Human Resources for the Department, Deputy Superintendent Norman Hill, Commander of Recruit Investigations; and the Appellant, I make the following findings of facts

On January 15, 2021, Certification No. 07505 was issued to the BPD by the states Human Resources Division (HRD). 1 D. The Appellant was ranked 65th on the certification. E. The BPD appointed 105 candidates from the certification, 82 of whom were ranked below the Appellant. F. The BPD notified the Appellant of the reasons for bypass on July 21, 2021 and the Appellant filed a timely appeal with the Commission on September 20, 2021.

On December 17, 2019, the states Human Resources Division (HRD) established an eligible list for police lieutenant. The Appellant was ranked 2nd. C. Since the establishment of the December 17, 2019 eligible list, there have been at least two (2) requisitions from the eligible list regarding promotional appointments. D. As part of the first requisition, the candidate ranked first on the eligible list was promoted. E.

On March 1, 2021, the states Human Resources Division (HRD) established an eligible list 1 for Reading fire lieutenant and forwarded it to the Town. D. In January 2022, a vacancy became open in the Reading Fire Department. E. At the time, the Appellant was tied with two other individuals for first on the abovereferenced eligible list. F. Another candidate tied with the Appellant was promoted to fire lieutenant. G.

Copies of any and all documents, reports, videos, emails, and notes or other written documentation or correspondence of any kind between the University (and/or an agent of the University) and the Human Resources Division(HRD) and Dr. Michael Brezsnyak regarding a temporary leave of absence for Officer Varosky from the position of Police Officer within the Umass Police Department. 3.