On January 15, 2021, Certification No. 07505 was issued to the BPD by the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD). 1 D. The Appellant was ranked 65th on the certification. E. The BPD appointed 105 candidates from the certification, 82 of whom were ranked below the Appellant. F. The BPD notified the Appellant of the reasons for bypass on July 21, 2021 and the Appellant filed a timely appeal with the Commission on September 20, 2021.
On December 17, 2019, the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) established an eligible list for police lieutenant. The Appellant was ranked 2nd. C. Since the establishment of the December 17, 2019 eligible list, there have been at least two (2) requisitions from the eligible list regarding promotional appointments. D. As part of the first requisition, the candidate ranked first on the eligible list was promoted. E.
Telephone Number Michele Heffernan, Esq. 617-727-3555 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Human ResourcesDivision, 100 Cambridge Street, Ste 600, Boston,MA Employee Organization (if any): z Local 509 5. Fax Number 02114 617-727-1477 7. Representative to contact 9.
Telephone Number Michele Heffernan, Esq. 617-727-3555 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Human ResourcesDivision, 100 Cambridge Street, Ste 600, Boston, MA 02114 6. Employee Organization (if any): SEIU, Local 509 8. 5. Fax Number 617-727-1477 7. Representative to contact 9.
Gore appeared tied for 57th on Certification 00974 issued to DOC by the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) on July 2, 2013. The DOC selected 182 applicants for appointment, 144 of whom were ranked below Mr. Rousseau. (Stipulated Facts). 4. James OGara is a Personnel Analyst III in the DOCs Human Resources Department. Mr. OGara is responsible for coordinating the background investigations for correction officer applicants.
Bowman1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 30, s. 49, the Appellants, Jose Batista and David Omasta (hereinafter Appellants or Batista and Omasta), are appealing the March 30, 2011 decision of the states Human ResourcesDivision (hereinafter HRD) denying their request for reclassification from the position of Skilled Laborer to the position of Maintenance Equipment 1 The Commission acknowledges the assistance of Law Clerk Mary B.
The decision of the Human ResourcesDivision and the Department of Transitional Assistance to deny the Appellants reclassification appeal is affirmed and the Appellants appeal is denied. By vote of the Civil Service Commission (Bowman, Chairman; Ittleman, Marquis, McDowell and Stein, Commissioners) on December 19, 2013. Christopher Chairman .
MacLean appealed his reclassification to the Executive Office for Administration and Finance Human ResourcesDivision. The Human Resources Division agreed with the Department that Mr. MacLean was properly classified as a Civil Engineer V and denied Mr. MacLeans request on November 30, 2010. (Exs. 2, 3.) Mark MacLean v. DCR 18. C-11-162/CS-11-349 On May 5, 2011, Mr.
On October 31, 2005, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reason: In November of 1994, Mr. Croteau had a one-year restraining order (209A) taken out on him by his ex-girlfriend. (Exhibit 1) 1994 Restraining Order 9. Exhibit 2 is a copy of the 1994 restraining order and application against the Appellant. (Exhibit 2) 10.
On September 7, 2004, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reasons: a) On March 1, 1993, Mr. Nahim was criminally charged with Assault and Battery upon his then-girlfriend. According to the incident report, his then-girlfriend indicated that Mr.
Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Paul M. Stein DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY DECISION The Appellant, Debra Olufemi, acting pursuant to G.L.c.31, 2(b), asserts an appeal against the Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD), challenging her bypass for provisional promotion to Tax Examiner III. DOR and HRD moved for Summary Decision.