Curtatone, Register 208 Cambridge Street Cambridge, MA 02141 617-679-6300 www.middlesexsouthregistry.com Bk: 80141 Pg: 305 Framingham Planning Board Memorial Building Room B14 150 Concord Street Framingham, MA 01702-8373 {508) 532-5450 COAG I ' I oo ar J30440 SHYT ALID Wi 1% 2S bd PLANNING BOARD To: LIsA FERGUSON, CITY CLERK FROM: SHANE O'BRIEN, SENIOR PLANNER RE: 770 WATER 57 AND 770 RR WATER ST {DECISION AND PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO PB-30-19 AND PB
Curtatone, Register 208 Cambridge Street Cambridge, MA 02141 617-679-6300 www.middlesexsouthregistry.com Bk: 73887 Pg: 2 co vO FRAMINGHAM 60 MASSAC H U SE TTS Cm Framingham Planning Board 150 Concord Street, Framingham, MA 01702 prTfti BUl.D - GROW^c M OEC -2 4 m o pZHl Members of the Planning Board: Christine Long, Chair - Shannon Fitzpatrick, Vice-chair - Kristina Johnson, Clerk - Joseph Norton - Aaron Bober
Helfer requested a copy of the investigation report regarding a fire that occurred on December 3, 2016 on Berkshire Street in the City ofCambridge. The DAO denied the request pursuant to Exemption (f) of the Public Records Law. Mr. Helfer appealed. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4).
MA 02108 62 Northampton Street, Suite 203 Boston, MA 02118 87 Tyler St, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02111 275 West Broadway South Boston, MA 02127 12 Bennington Street, Suite 202 East Boston, MA 02145 77 Kennedy Dr Malden, MA 02148 1 West St Cambridge, MA 02139 Dominican Development Center 42 Seaverns Ave Boston, MA 02130 East Boston Ecumenical Community Council 50 Meridian Street, Suite B1 East Boston, Ma 02128 197 Friend Street Boston, MA 02114 *Greater
City ofCambridge v, Civil Serv. Comm'n, 43 Mass, App. Ct. 300, 305, 682 N.E.2d 923 (1997), The department's consideration of DaVeiga's misconduct was based not only on his criminal offender record information (CORI), but included inquiries to the college and the Newton Division of the District Court Department for records and a personal interview with DaVeiga.
Civil Service Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (inconsequential differences in facts found were insufficient to find appointing authoritys justification unreasonable); City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 303-305, rev.den., 428 Mass. 1102 (1997) (same). See generally Villare v.
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass App.Ct. 411 rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIssac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 437, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, rev.den., 390 Mass. 1102 (1983).
Ruling (cont'd) MUP-17-6316 the Law and a violation of the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, and where the parties, through that agreement, have committed agreeable procedures for resolving their disputes. themselves to mutually City ofCambridge, 7 MLC 2111, 2112, MUP-3386 (May 6, 1981).
City ofCambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification means the Appointing Authority's actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.