Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name New Bedford Educators Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.

Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name New Bedford Educators Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.

Following the meeting the Principal decided to replace the reprimand with a letter of expectations. 3 The investigation resulted in a November 2022 settlement agreement with the Union and J.S. in which J.S. waived his right to contest a 10-day suspension without pay. On February 16, 2023, J.S. was involved in another incident with a student.

Yes, I apologize for missing that as part of the Settlement Agreement, the Charging Party withdraws its Charge. Thank you! Chelsea Chelsea K.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. ee ton soe war we ed INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party iis an Individual (0), Employee Organization (0), Employer 0 | (E: 40. Name Al. Representative to contact United Public Service Employees Union John D.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF WORCESTER And LOCAL 495, NAGE, SEIU SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (Regarding Custodial Services) 018 This Settlement Agreement by and between the City of Worcester (the City) and Local 495, NAGE, SEIU (the Union), witnesses that: 1.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. | | INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), fe Employer (E): 40. Name NAGE | se oe 41. Representative to contact Michael F. Manning, Esq. | 42.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

The Employer has repudiated a prior settlement agreement as well as the collective bargaining agreement and has also unilaterally changed terms and conditions of employment by unilaterally instituting a policy of recouping alleged salary overpayments to members of the paraprofessionals' bargaining unit.

Williams: The parties have reached a settlement agreement in the above-captioned matters. Accordingly, the Demand for Arbitration filed with AAA on June 18, 2015 and the Charge of Prohibited Practice filed with DLR in MUP-15-4592, are hereby withdrawn with prejudice. Matthew E. Dwyer ce: Patrick J.

Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Somerville Police Employees Representative to contact 20. Alan J.

Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Somerville Police Employees Association 19, Representative to contact Alan J.

SUP-14-3652 + * OFFICE & PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 6, AFL-CIO * * * and fe oes of oe fe oie oe fe 3s i oie he oe he oie 2s os fe As a fe 2s fe fe a fe ye fe ee a 2 Oe 2s oe 2s oo oe SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The Chief Justice for Administration and Management of the Trial Court (Trial Court) and the Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 6, AFL-CIO, (Union) agree as follows: 1.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): O 40. Name Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 6 41.

n addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Belmont Police Patrolmans Association 19. Representative to contact James F. Lamond 22.

Srednicki: The parties have reached a settlement in the above-referenced matter, a term of which requires the Belmont Police Patrolman's Association to withdraw the underlying charge that led to the issuance of the Complaint and request that the DLR dismiss that Complaint. On behalf of the Charging Party, I ask that the charge be withdrawn and that the complaint be dismissed. Thank you. Very truly yours, James F.

The Charging Party failed to make reasonable settlement efforts related to its Charge. 6. Any bargaining obligation that could exist has been waived by contract. 7. The alleged change was to unscheduled overtime, which is not a mandatory subject of bargaining. Respectfully submitted, Respondent Town of Belmont B~:_ Dated: February 27, 2017 /~ David M. Co y (B 0#638141) Colin R.

Bistany grieved her removal from ILD status and, by a Settlement Agreement with the City, was returned to ILD status effective November 18, 2009. Ex. 9; Testimony of Ms. Bistany 15. No medical bills were being paid by Meditrol or the City between approximately February 2009, when Ms. Bistany was ordered back to work, and March 2010, when the Settlement Agreement was entered into. Testimony of Chief Romero, Ms. Stevens, Ms. Bistany 16.

In this matter, on May 13, 2021 Logan Ping requested copies of financial statements and other documents in the possession of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection concerning how Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has used/dispersed funds from the 2010 Tronox Environmental Settlement Agreement and the 2014 Tronox Bankruptcy.

Herman requested records relating to a certain settlement agreement. The MSP provided a response to Mr. Herman on November 19, 2019, producing the final version of the settlement agreement and withholding drafts pursuant to Exemption (d). Unsatisfied with this response Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal, SPRl 9/2340, was opened as a result.