Loeal 59 7 Technology Drive Chelmsford, MA 3, 01824 A payroll deduction system will be implemented if approved by appropriate town officials. ARTICLE 24- SHOE ALLOWANCE 1. The chief will determine the style of approved shoes or boots. 2. Each officer will receive a shoe allowance of one hundred seventy five dollars ($175) each fiscal year for the replacement of shoes or boots. ARTICLE 25 - NEGOTIATION TEAM 1.

The treasurer will withhold the specified dues and once each month will mail said dues to; N.E.P.B.A. 7 Technology Drive Chelmsford, MA 01824 3. A payroll deduction system will be implemented if approved by appropriate town officials. ARTICLE 24- SHOE ALLOWANCE 1. The chief will determine the style of approved shoes or boots. 2.

The treasurer will withhold the specified dues and once each month will mail said dues to; N.E.P.B.A. 7 Technology Drive Chelmsford, MA 01824 3. A payroll deduction system will be implemented if approved by appropriate town officials. ARTICLE 24- SHOE ALLOWANCE 1. The chief will determine the style of approved shoes or boots. 2.

Town of Chelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982). Accordingly, I dismiss the Unions allegation that the Commonwealth independently violated Section 10(a)(1) when it reported Tingle and Kagacha to the BORN and subsequently terminated their employment. For all the above reasons, I dismiss the Unions charge in its entirety.

Town of Winchester, (CERB) does Chelmsford, 19 MLC not 8 MLC at 1596. either analyze The Commonwealth the 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 motivation Employment behind the Relations Board conduct, Town of (March 12, 1982), aff'd sub nom., Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983) or whether 23 the coercion 24 MLC at 1555-1556. succeeded or failed.

The Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (CERB) does not analyze the motivation behind the conduct, Town of Chelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982), affd sub nom. Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), or whether the coercion succeeded or failed. Gorton-Dunstable Regional School Committee, 15 MLC 1551, 1555-1556, MUP-6478 (March 20, 1989).

Town of Chelmsford, 41 MLC 85, 90 (2014) (emphasis added). In the case at bare, the City utterly failed to do so. As relates to Meninos overtime assignments, the City claimed that the 2016 audit criticized the Department for excessive overtime costs, and as a result, the City was taking several steps to reduce its overtime expenses.

Town of Chelmsford, 41 MLC 85, 90 (2014) (emphasis added). In the case at bare, the City utterly failed to do so. As relates to Meninos overtime assignments, the City claimed that the 2016 audit criticized the Department for excessive overtime costs, and as a result, the City was taking several steps to reduce its overtime expenses.

Archinski 7 iy Address (street and no., city/town, state, and ZIP code) A Title (if any) L, Dir. of Administration , Telephone Number 7 Technology Drive, Unit 102, Chelmsford, MA 01863 978-453-2500 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | hereby certify that | have served a copy of this Petition on the following representative(s) of the opposing partie(s).

Bhats office, Orthopedic Surgical Associates, PC in North Chelmsford, MA. On or about August 4, 2021, FutureComp arranged an appointment for the Appellant to see Dr. Bhat on August 16, 2021. (App.Exhs.9 & 26; Resp.Exhs.48 &.58; Tr. VIII;1475 [Bhat]) August 2021 Surveillance Investigation Report 66. On or about August 3, 2021, after the Appellants visit with Dr. Banco, but before he saw Dr.

To National or State Labor Organization New England Police Benevolent Association (Local 1) Name and Address of President of Local Labor Organization Phone Work: Officer Anthony Fiore - Local 1 President Phone Cell: 1 Adelaide St Wilmington, MA 01887 Email: nepbalocal1president@gmail.com Name and Address of Collective Bargaining Agent 978-815-6424 Phone Work: Daniel Crevier - New England Police Benevolent Association 7 Technology Drive Suite 200, Chelmsford

Town of Chelmsford, 27 MLC 41, 43 (2000), citing Town of Medway, 22 MLC 21 1261,1269 (1995). This exclusion has been narrowly interpreted to exclude as few employees as possible, while not unduly hindering the employer's operations. Silver Lake Regional School Committee, 1 MLC 1240, 1243 (1975).