Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Bd., 444 Mass. 1009 (2005) (rescript) (in absence of statutory limitations, agencies generally retain inherent authority to reconsider their decisions). Such power to reopen should be exercised by an agency with due circumspection sparingly as the cases say. Covell v. Department of Social Services, 42 Mass.App.Ct. 427, 433 (1997). Compare Ung v.

He checked the Appellants name in the sex offender registry, spoke to his employer and personal references. (Resp.Exhs.2 through 10; Testimony of Capt. Landry) 4 7. On November 7, 2021, the Appellant was required to complete an on-line Psychological History Questionnaire containing more than 150 questions. (Resp.Exh.2) 8. Save for the reports described below, Det. Furtados background investigation found no negatives in the Appellants background.

Those specialty jobs are defined as Detectives (Inspectors), School Resource Officer, Primary Boat Operator, Tech (IT) officer, Sex Offender Registry Officer, Domestic Violence Officer and Juvenile Officer. The specialty jobs identified above whether they exist at the present time or future they will be filled by GPPA members. The chief will post all specialty assignment openings for 15 days.

Sex Offender Registry Bd., 444 Mass. 1009 (2005) (rescript) (in absence of statutory limitations, agencies generally retain inherent authority to reconsider their decisions) Accordingly, the Commission evaluates the Appellants motion according to the mandate of the line of authority described above.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 488 Mass. 15 (2021). Specifically, the Appellant may argue constitutional issues where those issues are closely intertwined with the facts of a specific case subject to agency adjudication.

Sex Offender Registry Bd., 466 Mass. 381, 395 (2013). The decision to reconsider or reopen a hearing rests on the sound discretion of the [agency]. Id. at 396. [T]he discretion to reopen a closed proceeding should be exercised sparingly in order to preserve the resolving force of final administrative decisions[.] Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. Dept of Public Utilities, 461 Mass. 190, 195 (2011), citing Stowe v. Bologna, 32 Mass.