Department ofCorrection CSC Docket No. G1-12-79 DALA Docket No. CS-12-349 Dear Chairman Bowman: Enclosed please find the Recommended Decision that is being issued today. The parties are advised that, pursuant to 801 CMR 1.01(11)(c)(1), they have thirty days to file written objections to the decision with the Civil Service Commission. written objections may be accompanied by supporting briefs.
.: G1-12-219 DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission (Commission) voted at an executive session on May 2, 2013 to acknowledge receipt of the Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated March 4, 2013, the Appellants objections to the recommended decision; and Respondents opposition to the Appellants objections.
G1-15-28 DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Pro Se Kenneth Strong Appearance for Respondent: Andrew McAleer, Esq. Department of Correction PO Box 946: Industries Drive Norfolk, Ma 02056 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman1 DECISION On January 31, 2015, the Appellant, Kenneth Strong (Mr.
G1-14-8 DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent. Appearance for Appellant: John Pavlos, Esq. 120 Torrey Street Brockton, MA 02301 Appearance for Respondent: Jeffrey S. Bolger Department of Correction Industries Drive: P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION On January 8, 2014, the Appellant, Angelo Teixeira (Mr.
DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent DECISION Pursuant G.L. c. 31, 2(b) and/or G.L. c. 7, 4H, a Magistrate from the Division of CITY OF to SOMERVILLE, Administrative Law Appeals (DALA), was assigned to conduct a full evidentiary hearing regardingRespondent this matter on behalf of the Civil Service Commission (Commission). Pursuant to 801 CMR 1.01 (11) (c), the Magistrate issued the attached Tentative Decision to the Commission.
DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent DECISION Pursuant G.L. c. 31, 2(b) and/or G.L. c. 7, 4H, a Magistrate from the Division of CITY OF to SOMERVILLE, Administrative Law Appeals (DALA), was assigned to conduct a full evidentiary hearing regardingRespondent this matter on behalf of the Civil Service Commission (Commission). Pursuant to 801 CMR 1.01 (11) (c), the Magistrate issued the attached Tentative Decision to the Commission.
__;www.mass.gov/dala Docket Nos.: D-12-46, CS-12-363 _ DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Petitioner: Regina M. Ryan, Esq. Louison, Costello, Condon and Pfaff, LLP 100 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Appearance for Respondent: Julie E. Daniele, Esq. Division of Human Resources Department ofCorrection P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Angela McConney Scheepers, Esq.
D-11-206 DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Regina M. Ryan, Esq. Louison, Costello, Condon & Pfaff, LLP 101 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Respondents Attorney: Earl Wilson, Esq. Senior Labor Relations Specialist Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Christopher C.
.: D-13-34 DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission (Commission) voted at an executive session on August 22, 2013 to acknowledge receipt of: 1) the Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated July 1, 2013; 2) the Appellants Objections to the Recommended Decision; and 3) the Respondents Response to the Appellants Objections.
.: D-11-352 DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTION, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission (Commission) voted at an executive session on November 1, 2012 to acknowledge receipt of: 1) the Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated August 14, 2012; and 2) the Appellants Objections to the Recommended Decision. After careful review and consideration, the Commission voted to adopt the findings of fact of the Magistrate.