The Appellant has worked as a member of the Boston Housing Authoritys Police Department since March 2007 (Testimony of Appellant). offered a position as a BHA police officer Mr. Prior to his being O Loughlin was subjected to a psychological screening examination, given by Dr. John A. Greene, which he undertook and passed. Dr.

Murray Supervisor of Records May 24,20 18 SPR181700 Laurie Roy Records Access Officer Boston Housing Authority Legal Department; 1othFloor 52 Chauncy Street Boston, MA 021 11 Dear Ms. Roy: I have received the petition of Kharee L. Criswell appealing the response of the Boston Housing Authority (Authority) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 5 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Criswell requested a copy of: 1.

Contract expiration was once held indivisibly and literally to spell the simultaneous end of any grievance and arbitration provision, see Boston Housing Authority v. Nat! Conf. of Firemen & Oilers, Local 3, 458 Mass. 155, 165 (2010). However, the Legislature has since amended the Law to authorize evergreen extensions. Public employee collective bargaining agreement terms may remain viable even beyond the three-year duration statutory limit.

Boston Housing Authority, 29 MCSR 40 (2016). The Housing Authority argues that, based on this authority, the instant appeal should be dismissed as Mr. Martin was not terminated or laid off, but, rather, demoted. Argument of Mr. Martin By its clear and unambiguous language, G.L.c.121B, 29 'expanded' the civil service definition of "tenured employee", G.L.c.31, 1 to include housing authority personnel who had been employed for five or more years.

Fourth Affirmative Defense As the collective bargaining agreements had expired at the time of the alleged violations and as the collective bargaining agreements contained no "evergreen clause", there were no terms and conditions of employment in full force and effect at the time of the alleged violations pursuant to Boston Housing Authority v. National Conference of Firemen and Oilers.

Fourth Affirmative Defense As the collective bargaining agreements had expired at the time of the alleged violations and as the collective bargaining agreements contained no "evergreen clause", there were no terms and conditions of employment in full force and effect at the time of the alleged violations pursuant to Boston Housing Authority v. National Conference of Firemen and Oilers.

I know that NAGE is aware in October of 2010, in the case of BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY vs. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF FIREMEN AND OILERS, LOCAL, the Supreme Judicial Court held that under Chapter 150E, no provisions of a contract could extend beyond the term of the contract and evergreen clauses are not valid. In November of 2011, the legislature enacted Chapter 198 of the Acts of 2011 which authorized evergreen clauses to be inserted in CBAs.

payment of their step increases on September 1 of each year during the hiatus period between contracts. 2011 Amendment to M.G.L. c.150E, s.7(a) The School Committee also argues that legislative changes to M.G.L. c.150E, s. 1, 2013. 7(a) allowed it to withhold a step increase on September Specifically, the Committee contends that, following the amendment to Section 7(a) that the Legislature enacted in the wake of the Supreme Judicial Courts decision in Boston

In 2011, the Legislature amended M.G.L. 150E, sect. 7 after the issuance of the Supreme Judicial Courts decision in Boston Housing Authority v. Nat] Conference of Firemens and Oilers, Local 3, 458 Mass. 155 (2010).

In 2011, the Legislature amended M.G.L. 150E, sect. 7 after the issuance of the Supreme Judicial Courts decision in Boston Housing Authority v. Nat?] Conference of Firemens and Oilers, Local 3, 458 Mass. 155 (2010).

Boston Housing Authority, D-4565, January 12, 1992 (appeals dismissed where a Demand or Petition for Arbitration had been submitted.) 2 For all of the above reasons, the Appellants appeal under Docket Nos. G2-05-176 is hereby dismissed and the full hearing previously scheduled for August 13, 2007 is cancelled. _________________________________ Christopher C.

Sullivan asked if either of us wished to submit anything additional in light of the SJC decision regarding evergreen clauses, Boston Housing Authority v. National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, 458 Mass. 155 (2010) (BHA). The union had filed the charge prior to the 2010 decision and the Committee had not raised the BHA as a defense to the unions prohibitive practice charge. I have included a copy of my February 16, 2011 letter to Ms.

For arbitration expiration authority Please see: ,...on October 22, 2010, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its decision in Boston Housing Authority v. National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, Local 3 (Boston Housing), 458 Mass. 155 (2010).

Boston Housing Authority, D-4565, January 12, 1992 (appeals dismissed where a Demand or Petition for Arbitration had been submitted.) For all of the above reasons, the Appellants appeals under Docket Nos. G2-07-65 and G2-07-66 are hereby dismissed. _________________________________ Donald R.