Yes [J] No Note: The Division may decline to issue & complaint unless raasonablo settlement efforts hava been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(7), The Division may refer the charge to @ Division mediator for seHfement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. + Narne Kimberly Ostrom 20. 19. Representative to contact 21. Telephone Number Scott W.
Ma 7] Yes No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1}. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name AFSCME Council 93 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Joseph DeLorey 617-367-6035 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
The Appellant sought to (1) dismiss the appeal without prejudice; (2) toll the period in order to file a Motion for Reconsideration and to seek judicial review; (3) in the event the parties cannot come to settlement, the Commission shall accept a Motion for Reconsideration under the same docket number and without an additional filing fee; and (4) said Motion shall be filed within one hundred and eighty (180) days.
LABOR RELATIONS CASE CLOSING REPORT PS CONTRACT MEDIATION CASE 5. 18 loft Crook LN MEDIATOR: Cc Ya Leackory) on af UNION: EMPLOYER: rrataille Cre Cte REASON FOR RECOMMEDING CLOSURE: (] Settled After Mediation : ia Settle During Fact Finding Oo Settled Post Fact Finding Rpt No Mediation 1 Settled Post Fact Finding Mediation (0 Withdrawn Nome OTHER COMMENTS: ~ MEDIATOR: bors wfo petttch (e.g. additional settlement i.e. ULP" s) | ) SIGNED: /S/__.
Approximately two weeks later, Attleboro offered a settlement in the form of a last chance agreement (LCA) to Mr. OConnell. (Testimony of OConnell) 18. On March 17, 2011, Mr. OConnell, represented by counsel, rejected the LCA. (Testimony of OConnell) 19. On March, 22, 2011 Mr. OConnell was notified of his proposed termination. Mr. OConnell received a Notice of Hearing for his termination hearing and suspension appeal.
In addition, the Parties are direct ed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediat or for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
C] Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for setttement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name National Correctional Employees Union 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.