The City of Everett (City) Section 1 of the Law. is a public employer within the meaning of 2. The Committee is the representative of the City for the purpose of dealing with employees of the Citys public schools.

City of Everett, 26 MLC 25, 27, MUP-1542 (July 22, 1999). Dismissal (cont.) MUP-21-8530 and MUPL-21-8611 To prevail on its repudiation claim, the BPHC must show that the Union deliberately refused to abide by an unambiguous agreement. Boston School Committee, 22 MLC 1365, 1375, MUP-8125 (January 9, 1996); City of Quincy, 17 MLC 1603, 1608, MUP-6710 (March 20, 1991).

See City of Boston, 26 MLC 177, 181 (2000); City of Everett, 22 MLC 1303, 1309 (1995) (citing Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Labor Relations Commn, 404 Mass. 124, 127 (1989) and School Comm. of Newton v. Labor Relations Comm'n, 388 Mass. 557, 572 (1983)).

City of Everett, 26 MLC 25, 27, MUP-1542 (July 22, 1999). The Union argues that the Commonwealth repudiated the parties agreement by restricting Watershed employees from seeking and obtaining summer seasonal promotional opportunities in different regions, while granting exceptions to allow other employees not in the Watershed regions to seek and obtain summer seasonal promotional opportunities in different regions.

City of Everett, 26 MLC 25 (1999). Repudiation of an agreement must be supported by the "kind of clear and unequivocal statement of the parties responsibilities such that the Employer would have sufficient notice that specific acts or omissions were in violation of that agreement," _Higher Education Coordinating Council Council/MTA/NEA, SUP 4141 (1996), p.3 and Mass. Community College of Decision of the Administrative Law Judge.

City of Everett, 21 MCSR 307 (2008); Catterall v. City of New Bedford, 20 MCSR 196 (2007).

City of Everett, 26 MLC 25, 27, MUP-1542 (July 22, 1999). Here, | find that the Union failed to establish that the City repudiated the parties Agreement. The Union did not provide any evidence demonstrating how the City repudiated the parties Agreement.

Town of Arlington and Arlington Police Patrolmens Assoc., 42 MLC 97, MUP14-3750 (September 30, 2015), but see City of Everett and Everett Firefighters, IAFF Local 143, MUP-19-7133 (slip. op. August 27, 2021) citing Chelmsford School Committee, 8 MLC 1515, 1517 (A.O.

The City of Everett (City) is a public employer within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. 2. The Everett School Committee (School Committee) is the representative of the City for the purpose of dealing with school employees. 3. The Association is an employee organization within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. . 4. The Association is the exclusive bargaining representative for teachers employed by the School Committee. 5.

City of Everett, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 826, 829 (1979). Section the design 11 of the Law broadly commits of appropriate Moreover, remedies to the Board's discretion and expertise. Town of Brookfield v.