Willis Deputy General Counsel Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 /s/ Emily Sabo__________________ Emily Sabo Labor Counsel Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 28, 2020, I hereby caused a true and complete copy of the foregoing Answer to be served by email on Counsel for the Union, Jason Powalisz, Esquire.

Langan, Director of the Office of Employee Relations for the Human Resources Division (Langan), advised the MNA that the employer must remit the PFML contribution to the Department of PFML but may deduct from the employees wages up to 40% of the medical leave contribution and 100% of the family leave contributionThe Commonwealth intends to adopt the statutes baseline provision for dividing contributions between the employer and the employees.

In regard to BYPASS 1, the Boston Police Department notified the states Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following two (2) reasons: a) being rejected for employment by the Winthrop Police Department for fail[ing] to provide truthful responses in his application related to his place of residence; and b) failing to acknowledge that his drivers license had once been suspended. (Exhibit 1) 8.

Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place: Room 207 Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Christopher C.

G2-15-23 TOWN OF FALMOUTH & HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION, Respondents Appearance for Appellant: John F. Rossi, Esq. 185 Devonshire Street Suite 302 Boston, MA 02110 Appearance for Town of Falmouth: Melissa R. Murray, Esq. Collins, Loughran & Peloquin, P.C. 320 Norwood Park South Norwood, MA 02062 Appearance for HRD: Mark Detwiler, Esq. One Ashburton Place Room 207 Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Paul M.

Stein DECISION The Appellant, David OBrien, appealed to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) pursuant to G.L.c.31, 2(b), claiming that he was denied appointment as a Firefighter with the City of Fall River Fire Department (FRFD) because the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD) wrongfully reported to the FRFD that he had failed the Physical Abilities Test (PAT) administered by HRD.

p.9 Anderson, Jeanette From: Sent: To: Subject: Casey, Kimberley A Thursday, July 07, 2016 5:13 PM Anderson, Jeanette Information requested/Jeanette Anderson Hi Jeanette, I spoke to Michael Rutherford (Director, Employee & Labor Relations) and he reminded me that this information is on . the reclassification form, which lists the following information: | if the employee does not agree with the Universitys finding, an appeal may be filed with the Human

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division Legal Department Boston, MA Re: 02114 SUP-19-7136, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Revenue Dear Ms. OBrien and Ms. Thomson: The National Association of Government Employees (NAGE or Union) seeks review of a Department of Labor Relations (DLR) Investigators decision to dismiss the above-referenced charge of prohibited practice.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION C-15-190 Notice to: April 14, 2017 Cynthia A. Ittleman, Commissioner Brooks A. Ames, Esq.

GOVERNING PROVISIONS: G.L. c. 150E, 7(d); Appendix G, Article 17 By statute, the personnel administrator/Human Resource Division (HRD) keeps the office and position classification plans as well as the pay plans for the Commonwealth. G.L. c. 30, 45. Ordinarily, it is HRD that decides what is in job specifications and what they mean.

Valerio Dominello & Hillman, LLC Suite 300B Westwood, MA 02090 Appearance for Human Resources Division: Melinda Willis, Esq. Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Ste. 600 Boston, MA 02114 Commissioner: Cynthia A.

A pre-hearing conference was conducted at the offices of the Commission on August 18, 2009, which was attended by the Appellant, counsel for DTA and counsel for the states Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD). DTA filed a Motion to Dismiss the Appellants appeal with the Commission on October 30, 2009 and forwarded a copy of its motion to the Appellant and HRD.

Perusse or Appellant), is appealing the June 28, 2006 decision of the Human Resources Division (HRD) denying her request for reclassification from the position of Accountant I to the position of Contract Specialist II. The appeal was timely filed and a hearing was held on June 5, 2007 at the offices of the Civil Service 1 Commission (hereinafter Commission). One tape was made of the hearing.