However, based on our in camera review of the minutes and conversations with legal counsel, we note that the Board discussed terms for a settlement agreement with the Town Clerk, which necessitated transferring money from one department to another. The Board returned to open session after the conclusion of the executive session and discussed the open session topics.
Brian Arbitrator March 6, 2015 ARB-14-3898 TTT Pee TTT In the matter of the arbitration between: TOWN OF WAREHAM -andLABORERS STTS ACHE MASS DISTRICT COUNCIL aE eke AO RE ll Te TTT EE EEE EE * * * * * EEE EEE EEE EE EE EE EEE * SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ent in the above The parties agree that they have reached a tentative settlement agreem settlement.
On October 28, 1998, in settlement of a case before the Civil Service Commission, Appellant and the Town entered into an agreement (hereinafter Settlement Agreement) whereby the parties agreed that, effective as of the date of the Settlement Agreement, Appellant would be designated and would hold the job title/classification of full time/temporary MEO II, and would continue to hold said position unless that job title/classification was changed as
[| Yes No There is no basis for settlement Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Greenfield Education Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.
In accordance with the terms of resulting settlement agreement, the Charging Party hereby withdraws the above-referenced charge with prejudice and respectfully requests that the Department close this matter.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
Bresnahan Subject: Brockton Education Association and Brockton School Committee MUP-15-5013 Gentlemen: I can confirm that a Settlement Agreement has been signed by the parties and that the BEA hereby withdraws the Prohibited Practice Charge (MUP-15-5013) from further proceedings before the Department of Labor Relations pursuant to that Settlement Agreement. Thank you for your cooperation with this matter and have a great weekend. Colin Colin R.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |O 40. Name 41. Representative to contact Brockton Education Assocaition, Kimberly Gibson, President 42.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
Sunkenberg, James (DLR) From: Sent: James Hykel Wednesday, August 29, 2018 10:26 AM To: Sunkenberg, James (DLR) Ce: Subject: Jack Collins Re: Oak Bluffs, MUP-17-6101, MUP-17-6323, MUP-16-6654 Good morning, Pursuant to the parties' settlement, the Charging Party hereby withdraws the charges in the above-captioned matter. Please let me know if you require anything further.
[ Yes [Y] No fait accompli Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Oak Bluffs Professional Firefighters & Paramedi| 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number James Hykel 617-367-7200 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
While it appeared that an agreement had been reached at various times, on each occasion the union either declined to honor the deal or decided to propose additional conditions that were not part of the original settlement. The union has made it clear that they had no real interest in having the bargaining unit members actually be trained or perform firefighting duties.
On October 19, 2021, the parties reached an oral agreement (Settlement Agreement) to settle Case No. SUP-21-8753. 10. As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Commonwealth agreed, in part, to conclude the investigation of the DSW referred to in paragraph 4 within one week and provide backpay for lost differential pay during their period of administrative leave. 11.
Yes [J No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Robert Van Campen, Esq. 617-367-6027 AFSCME Council 93 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Notice of Withdrawal and Cancellation of Scheduled Hearing (SUP- 12-2280) with 1 Certificate of Service Notice of Withdrawal and Cancellation of Scheduled Hearing (ASF-12-2284) with Certificate of Service Settlement Agreement Very: truly yours,.._. E.
Moore has not responded when AFSCME counsel left phone messages to call, and he sent one e-mail which did nothing to advance progress toward settlement. 4. Actual Facts Mr. Moore and AFSCME (with another employee not here relevant) agreed by written memorandum in 2003 on deduction of agency service fees, which agreement and authorization card (attached by Mr. Moore to his complaint as his Exhibit B) was in effect until 2012. Although Mr.
L] No Yes Premature; however, Petitioner encourages settlement of the Charge of Prohibited Practice. Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 17. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Same 603-888-0897 Mark E.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. Y | INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): 40. Name Leominster Patrolmen's Union, MassCOP Local 364 O | 41. Representative to 42.
To ensure that the department was following the settlement described in paragraph 4, he asked Lieutenant Michael Goldman (Goldman) about what Rodriguez was doing. 6. Monitoring compliance protected activity. 7. On May 5, 2014, Healey emailed Vasquez a written warning, stating among other things: If you have concerns or questions regarding UNION issues, you shall direct those concerns to my office only...
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
Sessions Held to Date and Date of Last Session Six Sessions; Last Session: February 13, 2012 Statement of Issues in Dispute (Use another page if necessary) Please see attached Description of Any Prohibited Practice Charges Pending Between the Parties Size and composition of Units (Total # of Employees Covered by the Contract) 10 Name and Titles of Members of Bargaining Committees Ryan Lucy, Union President Bob Nason, Management Town Manager Manner of Settlement