On July 31, 2023, I held an expedited show cause conference to provide the Petitioner with the opportunity to show cause why such an investigation should be initiated by the Commission, which was attended by counsel for the Petitioner, the Union President, a member of the Unions E-Board, counsel for the City, and General Counsel for the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD).
On November 17, 2014 | was notified at DOC Milford Headquarters by DOC Human ResourcesDivision in a sealed envelope from Glen Shor, Secretary and Katie Hammer, Asst. Secretary from the Executive Office for Administration and Finance that my position was being reclassified effective December 14, 2014. This letter also stated: The transition will not result in any reduction in pay or benefits.
On November 17, 2014 | was notified at DOC Milford Headquarters by DOC Human ResourcesDivision in a sealed envelope from Glen Shor, Secretary and Katie Hammer, Asst. Secretary from the Executive Office for Administration and Finance that my position was being reclassified effective December 14, 2014.This letter also stated: The transition will not result in any reduction in pay or benefits.
In the fall of 2014, the Commonwealth's Executive Office for Administration and Finance and the Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), in cooperation with the DOC, conducted a review of Management I-V positions and determined that certain of those positions, including the Charging Parties positions, should be reclassified as nonmanagerial and be included in statewide bargaining unit 6 (Unit 6), which is represented by the National Association of Government
Some time prior to October, 2014, the Human ResourcesDivision of the Commonwealth (HRD) conducted a review of job titles of managers who were Moschos and compensated between levels M-I through M-V at all state agencies. review, HRD that of result a As Creggs positions were included in that review. concluded that a number of job titles that were compensated in grades M-| through M-V would be more appropriately classified as union positions in statewide
. _ Date / 13 EXHIBIT Pod Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision Classification Specification I. CAMPUS POLICE OFFICER HIGHER EDUCATION SERIES: Campus Police Officer I Campus Police Officer II Campus Police Officer III Il.
The Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) shall within 60 days of this order establish and issue a written policy for all executive department employees to require proof of COVID-19 vaccination, and the heads of all executive department agencies, bureaus, departments, offices, and divisions shall then implement the terms of the HRD policy.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts 2 Human ResourcesDivision 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 878-9888 melissa.thomson@mass.gov CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 28, 2022, I hereby caused a true and complete copy of the foregoing Answer to be served by email to Counsel of Record for the Union. 3
Executive Order 595 directed the Human ResourcesDivision, within 60 days of the order, to establish and issue a written policy for all executive department employees to require proof of COVID-19 vaccination . . . . Id. 5.
The Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) shall within 60 days of this order establish and issue a written policy for all executive department employees to require proof of COVID-19 vaccination, and the heads of all executive department agencies, bureaus, departments, offices, and divisions shall then implement the terms of the HRD policy.
(Exhibits and Testimony) On or about October 16, 2004, the Commonwealths Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) conducted a Civil Service Promotional Examination to establish a list of eligible candidates for promotion to the rank of sergeant in the Reading Police Department. (Testimony) The Appellant took the examination for the position of Sergeant and received a score of 87, ranking him first on the certified eligible list.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, BOSTON, MA 02108 DEVAL L. PATRICK JAY GONZALEZ Governor Secretary TIMOTHY P. MURRAY Lieutenant Governor PAUL DIETL Chief Human Resources Officer VIA HAND DELIVERY DLRMAVI4'19en2:59 May 14, 2013 . ss Edward B.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 RE: SUP-13-2536, Commonwealth of Mass. and Mass. Nurses Assoc. Dear Ms. Marshall and Ms.
McNally, Esq. abor Counsel Human ResourcesDivision 1 Ashburton Place, Roo m 207 Boston, MA 617-878-9885 02108 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Challis McNally, certify that a true copy of the foregoing Response was served upon Alan Shapiro, Esq., MNA, via certified mail on 2-22-/3 Vs ik Vy LPF (Shall A. McNally, Esq. L
City of New Bedford Office of the City Solicitor 133 William Street, Room 203 New Bedford, MA 02740-6163 Human ResourcesDivision Attorney: Martha Lipchitz OConnor, Esq. Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Paul M.
Firm/Organization Name Human ResourcesDivision, Commonwealth of Massachusetts EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (if any) 1 17. Name National Association of Government Employees 18. Telephone Number 617-376-0220 19,20,21,22. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 159 Burgin Parkway Quincy MA 02169 23. FAX Number 617-376-0285 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 24. Name Joel Buenaventura 25.
The Commission, after hearing, accepts the parties agreement and pursuant to the powers of relief inherent in Chapter 534 of the acts of 1976, as amended by Chapter 310 of the Acts of 1993 and orders the Human ResourcesDivision to take the following action: The Civil Service Commission directs that the Human Resources Division (HRD) and the City of Malborough to place Michael Lopes name at the top of the eligibility list for appointment to the position
Cards were mailed out to eligible candidates by the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) asking the candidates to confirm that they would be willing to accept the promotion if selected by DOC. The last day to execute the cards for consideration for recent job postings was November 6, 2006. The Appellant did not receive one of the above-referenced cards as his updated mailing address was not listed with HRD.