I am also seeking any files you have related to the subsequent police internal affairs inquiry, the St. Clair Commission, the federal review, the Fairfax Group inquiry, or any other outside inquiry or review of the case. The files produced in this production are associated with the investigation into the homicides of Carol DiMaiti and Christopher Stuart.
I am also seeking any files you have related to the subsequent police internal affairs inquiry, the St. Clair Commission, the federal review, the Fairfax Group inquiry, or any other outside inquiry or review of the case. On December 6, 2021, this Office provided you with the requested documents.
BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Docket Number: D1-22R-138 Appearance for Appellant: Kenneth H. Anderson, Esq. Anderson, Goldman, Tobin & Pasciucco, LLP 50 Redfield Street, #201 Boston, MA 02122 Appearance for Respondent: James J. Megee, Esq. Office of the Boston Police Department Legal Advisor One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 Commissioner: Angela C.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS Before the COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD In the Matter of BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION, Charging Party, and CITY OF BOSTON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MUP-17-5952 CHARGING PARTY'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CHARGE The Charging Party asserts that the Investigator erred when she dismissed the portion of the charge seeking the Internal Affairs
Labor Counsel Office of Labor Relations Boston City Hall, Room 624 Boston, MA 02201 RE: MUP-17-5952, City of Boston and Boston Police Superior Officers Federation Dear Attorneys Bryant and Boyle: The Boston Police Superior Officers Federation reconsideration of a ruling issued by the Commonwealth (BPSO or Union) seeks Employment Relations Board (CERB) on April 6, 2018 concerning the above-referenced charge of prohibited practice.
.: MUP-17-5952 *+ Date Issued: April 6, 2018 * * and * * * BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION RREKKEKEKKEEKEREKREKEKKKKKKKEKKAKK KKK KKK KKK KK RR RR: K AMENDED COMPLAINT OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE ON REMAND Background On May 1, 2017, the Boston Police Superior Officers Federation (Union) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the City of Boston (City) had engaged in prohibited practices
COMMONWEALTH Re ELOYMENT FAX: (617)em 626-7157 katutope LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR BOARD MEMBER www.mass.gov/dlr MUP-17-5952 Charging Party: Boston Police Superior Officers Fed.
The Boston Police Superior Officers Federation (the Federation) is an employee organization within the meaning of Section | of the Law. 3. The Federation is the exclusive bargaining representative of non-detectives sergeants, lieutenants, and captains (superior officers) of the Boston Police Department.
[Joint Exhibit 6] Federation # (9) On July 3, 2013, Federation Vice President Mark Parolin wrote a letter to Superintendent Frank Maneni, citing Department Rule 114, Section 5, and requesting that the Internal Affairs Division (JAD) take immediate action on the alleged complaint. [See Attachment F (Letter from Mark Parolin to Frank Mancini, July 3, 2013) and Attachment G (Boston Police Department Rules and Procedures, Rule 114).]
MENINO Mayor PauL CURRAN, EsQumRE DIRECTOR September 4, 2013 Edward Srednicki, Executive Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1 Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION AND THE CITY OF BOSTON, MUP-13-3023 Dear Mr. Srednicki: Enclosed please find the Respondent, City of Bostons, Response to the Amended Charge with Certificate of Service in the above named matter.
The Boston Police Superior Officers Federation (Federation) claimed it had not received in a timely fashion from the Boston Police Department (Department) a copy of a June 22, 2013 sexual harassment complaint. Motion for Summary On September 2, 2014 the Federation filed a Disposition with numerous exhibits attached. The Hearing Officer indicated that the City could respond to that Motion for Summary Disposition in this posthearing memorandum.
.: MUP-13-3023 Charging Party: Boston Police Superior Officers Fed. Respondent: Boston, City of Date Filed: 07/31/2013 NOTICE OF COMPLAINT PROCEDURE FOR SCHEDULING HEARING Pursuant to G.L. c. 150E, 11, the Department of Labor Relations (Department or DLR) issues the attached Complaint of Prohibited Practice in the above-referenced case.
The Boston Police Superior Officers Federation (Union) and Lieutenant Cawley exercised their rights under the parties collective bargaining agreement and filed a grievance alleging that Lieutenant Cawleys termination lacked just cause.
BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION Case No. MUP-13-3023 * " Date Issued: July 28, 2015 Hearing Officer: Margaret M. Sullivan, Esq. Appearances: Robert J. Boyle Jr., Esq. - Representing the City of Boston Jillian M.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS In the matter of: BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION, Charging Party, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) V. CITY OF BOSTON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) MUP-13-3023 CHARGING PARTY BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION'S POST-HEARING BRIEF I.
Williams requested public portions of the internal affairs/complaints/investigations, and related correspondence, statements of witnesses, police and incident reports filed against [an identified Cambridge Police Officer]. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Mr. Williams petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/1750, was opened as a result. Subsequently, I learned that the City provided Mr.
The other Boston Police Officer assigned to the Downtown Crossing, Officer Rivers, did not write any citations on this date. ( Exhibit 8). 12. When interviewed about this citation almost three months later by the Internal Affairs Division, Officer Williams stated that he did not recall the circumstances surrounding this citation, but he denied yelling at Ms.
Burke conducted by Cambridge Police Sergeant Thomas Ahearn, and it was at this time that Mr. Burke was told that he was going to have to produce his employment records. (Testimony of Burke) 8. Mr. Burke also signed a certification in the application that his answers are true which also provided that he could be disqualified if his answers or information were found to be untrue. (Exhibit 5) 9.
Name Boston Police Superior Officers Federation 18. Telephone Number 503-705-5036 19,20,21,22. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 2 Liberty Sq., 10th Floor Boston MA 02109 23. FAX Number 617-367-4820 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 24. Name Patrick N. Bryant 25. Telephone Number 5037055036 26,27,28,29.
D1-17-027 BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Bryan Decker, Esq. Decker & Rubin, P.C. 295 Freeport Street Boston, MA 02122 Appearance for Respondent: Katherine Hoffman, Esq. Boston Police Department Office of the Legal Advisor One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 Commissioner: Cynthia A. Ittleman DECISION The Appellant, Kirk Merricks, (Mr.
D-21-252 E-21-253 BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Alan H. Shapiro, Esq. Sandulli Grace, P.C. 44 School Street, 11th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Appearance for Respondent: Joseph A. McClellan, Esq. Office of the Legal Advisor Boston Police Department One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 Commissioner: Christopher C.