L. . 30A, 14, the City of Worcester brought this action challenging the reinstatement of patrol officer Leon Dykas by the Civil Service Commission. The plaintiff asks this court to vacate the Commission's decision and affirm Worcesters termination of Dykas, because the Commissions decision was based upon an error of law and was arbitrary and capricious.

A pre-hearing conference was held at the offices of the Civil Service Commission on April 20, 2004. A full hearing was held at the offices of the Civil Service Commission on June 3 and November 10, 2004.[3] The Parties post-hearing briefs/recommended decisions were due December 13, 2004. By mutual agreement, the filing of the post-hearing briefs and/or recommended decisions was extended until January 18, 2005.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: RODOLFO AGUILAR, Appellant Decision mailed: _/ 2/3i1b Pi ania Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 Vv. DEPARTMENT of WORFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Case No.: C-10-32 Respondent DECISION After careful review and consideration, the Civil Service Commission voted at an executive session on December 2, 2010 to acknowledge receipt of the report of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated October 27, 2010.

Fhe C oth of icsncchusetts Decision maited: // CIID Civil Service Commission O83 ONOACRN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION BLOOMFIELD Appellant One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA 02108 > Room 503 (617) 727-2293 v.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 MARC SAVAGE, Appellant Case No.: D-17-247 v.

.: DEPARTMENT G1-12-30 OF CORRECTION, Respondent DECISION The Civil Service Commission voted at an executive session on July 12, 2012 to acknowledge receipt of the report of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated May 31, 2012. No written objections were received by either party. After careful review and consideration, the Commission voted to adopt the findings of fact and the recommended decision of the Magistrate therein.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA THOMAS PENNOR, Appellant Room 503 02108 (617) 727-2293 v. Case No.: CITY OF BROCKTON, D1-08-77 Respondent DECISION After careful review and consideration, the Civil Service Commission voted at an executive session on October 1, 2009 to acknowledge receipt of the report of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated August 17, 2009. No comments were received by the Commission from either party.

Judgment to enter affirming the Decision of the Civil Service Commission, Judgment for the Defendants. Die Dated at Boston, Massachusetts this 20th day of March, 2008. . Obed Michael Joseph Donovan, Me Clerk of the Courts NWWybd e& Approved as to Form: Brassard, J.,Justice of the Superior Court cvdjudgen.wpd 3249041 opmemfi goldrick JUDGMENT ENTERED ON CKETORMAGS_R CIV!

A full hearing was held on the section 43 appeal on February 14, 2006 at the offices of the Civil Service Commission. Two (2) tapes were made of the hearing. As no written request was received from either party, the hearing was declared to be private. The witnesses giving testimony were not sequestered.

Chapter 31, 43, with the Civil Service Commission. A Full Hearing of that appeal was subsequently heard at the Civil Service Commission by this Commissioner on October 14 and December 14, 2004. A decision was voted on and issued by the Commission, on that appeal, on December 8, 2005. That decision dismissed the Appellant Mark Garretts appeal on Docket No. D-04-63. See Mark Garrett v.