Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 Re: MUPL-15-4395 et al., Teamsters, Local 25 Dear Mr. Chalupa and Mr. Stern: On March 24, 2015, Anthony Poleo et al. (Poleo) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).'
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 Re: MUPL-15-4395 et al., Teamsters, Local 25 Dear Mr. Chalupa and Mr. Stern: On March 24, 2015, Anthony Poleo et al. (Poleo) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).'
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 Re: MUPL-15-4395 et al., Teamsters, Local 25 Dear Mr. Chalupa and Mr. Stern: On March 24, 2015, Anthony Poleo et al. (Poleo) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).'
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 Re: MUPL-15-4395 et al., Teamsters, Local 25 Dear Mr. Chalupa and Mr. Stern: On March 24, 2015, Anthony Poleo et al. (Poleo) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).'
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 Re: MUPL-15-4395 et al., Teamsters, Local 25 Dear Mr. Chalupa and Mr. Stern: On March 24, 2015, Anthony Poleo et al. (Poleo) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).'
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 Re: MUPL-15-4395 et al., Teamsters, Local 25 Dear Mr. Chalupa and Mr. Stern: On March 24, 2015, Anthony Poleo et al. (Poleo) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).'
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 617 776 4020 www.attorneymarkdstern.com website mds@attorneymarkdstern.com . alternate email address EXHIBIT H COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS NO. MUPL-17-5847 Charging Party: Michelle Mangino v. Respondent: Revere Police Superior Officers Association AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES V. CALLAHAN I, Charles V. Callahan, do hereby swear and depose the following: .
Stern P.C. 34 Liberty Avenue Somerville, MA 02144 617 776 4020 www.attornevmarkdstern.com website mds@attornevmarkdstern.com alternate email address EXHIBIT H COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS NO. MUPL-17-5847 Charging Party: Michelle Mangino v. Respondent: Revere Police Superior Officers Association AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES V. CALLAHAN I, Charles V. Callahan, do hereby swear and depose the following: 1.
City ofSomerville, 20 MCSR 513, 515 (Aug, 20, 2007) (custodian with a lengthy discipline history was denied vacation time in late August because the school he was responsible for was not ready for the school term to begin; when he nonetheless took sick time that week to attend his sons bachelor party in Las Vegas, he was terminated). . Taking into account Ms.
City ofSomerville v. Somerville Municipal Employees Assoc., 20 Mass. App. Ct. 594, 597 (1985). In filling a vacancy, even a temporary one, appointing authorities are required, to follow the carefully prescribed requirements set forth in c. 31. Id. at 597. Chapter 31 of the General Laws further provides that a tenured civil service employee shall not be discharged, for example, without just cause and an appropriate hearing. G.L. c. 31, 41 44.
Similarly, neither the Appeals Courts opinion in City ofSomerville v.Somerville Mun. Employees Assn, 20 Mass.App.Ct. 594, rev.den., 396 Mass. 1102 (1985), nor the Commissions Decision in Greely v. Belmont, 19 MCSR 2006 provides 25 succor. The Somerville case involved an arbitrators award that had ordered back pay to certain employees under a CBA. See also, City of Springfield v.
City ofSomerville, 29 MCSR 525 (2010) (citizen harassment); Andrade v. Town of Hudson, 21 MCSR 73 (2008) (bar fight); Rivers v. Town of Wilmington, 19 MCSR 425 (2000) (bar fight). The heightened scrutiny that applies to such behavior stems from the exemplary standard to which such officers are expected to hold themselves.
City ofSomerville, 42 MLC 170, 171, MUP-13- 17 At the hearing, the Union argued that the email from management confirming removal of GPS memorialized the parties agreement. Even if one assumes that this email constituted a signed writing by MEP, a signed writing from HRD would still be necessary to abandon the MOU. 13 HO Decision (contd) SUP-19-7421 1 2977 (December 30, 2015). Employee safety is a mandatory subject of bargaining.
Rami Bridge Somerville Education Association 8 Bonair Street Somerville, MA Re: 02145 j | | Somerville Teachers Association/Unit C/Request for Information Gentlemen, This correspondence responds to Mr. Caraballo-Burgos request for information 2020, and is forwarded by email on December 23, 2019, and Mr.