The employer made much of Ouellettes access to confidential attorney client communications and settlement agreements. But those communications and agreements pertain to student issues and discipline. Ouellette does not have access to attorney client communications concerning collective bargaining since the DSS plays no role in the collective bargaining process.
The employer made much of Ouellettes access to confidential attorney client communications and settlement agreements. But those communications and agreements pertain to student issues and discipline. Ouellette does not have access to attorney client communications concerning collective bargaining since the DSS plays no role in the collective bargaining process.
See Board of Higher Education, 33 MLC 12, 14, CAS-05-3613 (June 23, 2006)(excluding president's administrative assistant as confidential because, in addition to opening letters from the vice president of administration and finance regarding financial matters, she received faxes regarding proposed settlement agreements with bargaining units and from the vice president of academic affairs regarding personnel matters including pending civil rights complaints
18, 2018 4:33 PM Erin DeRenzis; Cawley, Kathy (kcawley@scsdma.org)' (kcawley@scsdma.org) Ce: Efile DLR (EOL) Subject: RE: SUP-17-6054, Suffolk County Sheriff's Dept and AFSCME, Council 93 Please be advised that, at the request of the parties, the Department of Labor Relations (Department) has decided to administratively close the above-referenced case for fourteen (14) days (i.e., until Tuesday, October 2, 2018) to allow the parties to execute a settlement
fait accompli Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge toa Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (0), O Employer (E): 7 40. Name ee 41. Representative to contact AFSCME Council 93 ' 42.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
On various dates between January 2020 and March 2020, the Appellant engaged in settlement discussions with the Department related to the Troop E Internal Affairs investigation. (Stipulation) 42 193. Present for the settlement discussions were Lieutenant Colonel Warmington, the Appellant, counsel for the Appellant, and the Union President (Trooper Corey Mackey). (Stipulation) 194.
Sent: To: Monday, August 12, 2019 6:27 PM Singh, Samantha (DLR); Efile DLR (EOL) Ce: Nicholas.Dominello@VDHBoston.com; Heather.McCarthy@VDHBoston.com; Nagle, Kathy RE: MUP-19-7389 Notice of In-Person Investigation Conference Subject: To whom it may concern: The parties have reached a settlement in the above-referenced matter. As a result, the Association wishes to withdraw the pending charge.
lv] Yes CJ Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR No 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name East Bridgewater Education Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.
[v] Yes L] No 15.04(1) Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name Nat'l Conf. of Firemen 20. & Oilers, Local 3, SEIU 19. Representative to contact 21.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
The rationale behind the policy is to encourage the prompt and effective settlement of public sector disputes utilizing binding grievance and arbitration procedures and to employ arbitrators with an expertise in contract analysis and interpretation. City of Boston, 1 MLC 1228 (1974). The instant case is appropriate for deferral.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39, The Charging Party is an Individual {I), Employee Organization (0), Employer (E): N| 40. Name 41. Representativeto Southampton Teachers Association c/o Elizabeth contact = 42.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. aa ne INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (0), Employer - (E): en 40. Name Southampton Teachers Association c/o Elizabeth 41.
On behalf of the Southampton Teachers Association and pursuant to a Settlement Agreement between the parties, I hereby withdraw the STAs Charge in MUP-20-8295. Thank you. Rich Richard A.
XXIX Article XXX Article XXXI Appendix A-1 Appendix A-2 Appendix A-3 Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Resolution of Disputes Personnel Files Paid Details Minimum Manpower Jury Duty Educational Incentive Program Longevity Schedule Rights and Privileges Printing of Contract Hepatitis Vaccination and Testing Detailing of Personnel Duration of Agreement Salary Schedule July 1, 2010 Salary Schedule July 1, 2011 Salary Schedule July 1, 2012 Arbitration Settlement
\YNC CDL Warnool VOR Wea) ia) NM No Include the be ves CO Yes No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact fi RSMAD R : We hae 19. \Vie ler Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 22. The Charging Party is an: AID Coo f S7 a 1, Ciivone: S19 LLL f 20.
The City and Union agree that if any portion of this drug and alcohol testing program (or the Citys right to act upon the results thereof), which are essential components of the parties settlement, are held invalid by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance or enforcement of any such provision is in any way restrained, then the City shall have no obligation to pay or to continue in effect the $.50 salary increases (or any subsequent
The City and Union agree that if any portion of this drug and alcohol testing program (or the Citys right to act upon the results thereof), which are essential components of the parties settlement, are held invalid by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance or enforcement of any such provision is in any way restrained, then the City shall have no obligation to pay or to continue in effect the $.50 salary increases (or any subsequent
A) Yes No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04/7). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 1 Name 18. Representative to contact Grinnna Usarand - 19. Address (street and No.. city/town, state, and ZIP code) OD 22. CUNE713 The Charging Party is an. 6 22D . Je. 20. Telephone Number Lhe OK 3ADY 323 Opa 2 1.
The City and Union agree that if any portion of this drug and alcohol testing program (or the Citys right to act upon the results thereof), which are essential components of the parties settlement, are held invalid by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance or enforcement of any such provision is in any way restrained, then the City shall have no obligation to pay or to continue in effect the $.50 salary increases (or any subsequent
The City and Union agree that if any portion of this drug and alcohol testing program (or the Citys right to act upon the results thereof), which are essential components of the parties settlement, are held invalid by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance or enforcement of any such provision is in any way restrained, then the City shall have no obligation to pay or to continue in effect the $.50 salary increases (or any subsequent