See, e.g, In re Civil Service Status of Seven Employees of the City of Springfield, 27 MCSR 230 (2014) (permanency granted to improperly appointed provisional labor service workers when no such civil service classification exists, but permanency denied to official service plumber); Ottomaniello v. City of Springfield, 25 MCSR 207 (2012) (city granted but, then, erroneously revoked permanency under ConTest); DiNicola v.

undersigned hereby declare(s) that a business under the title: Eversource Energy eondweted at 215 Shelburne Road, Greenfield, MA 01301 (if this location is a residential rental property, a signed, dated letter of acknowledgement and approval by the owner(s) of the property must be filed with this Business Certificate). by the following persons(s) or corporation: Full Name (print) Residence or Corporate Address NStar Electric Company 300 Cadwell Drive, Springfield

On November 14t\ the Department explained it has no records regarding the cities of Springfield or Chicopee; therefore, Mr. Lefebvre would need to make a request directly to those cities. By email on November 16th, the Department provided Mr. Lefebvre with the only fiber optic coverage map of Holyoke that exists, waiving all fees in doing so. As a result, Mr.

City of Springfield, MUP-3720 (June 19, 1980)(Board determined the employer had repeatedly acted to diminish the unions status as exclusive representative during ongoing negotiations). Here, I find that the October 18 email by Fernandes was not a violation of the Law. The Union proposed changes to the mentorship program during negotiations, and the Employer responded by engaging in good faith but hard bargaining in rejecting those proposals.

G.L. c. 31, 32; see City of Springfield v. Civil Serv. Commn, 469 Mass. 370, 375 n.11 (2014). As the Commission looks at evidence it must focus on the fundamental purposes of the civil service system to guard against political considerations, favoritism, and bias in governmental employment decisions . . . and to protect efficient public employees from political control. City of Cambridge, 43 Mass. App. Ct. at 304.

In Re: 2010/2011 Review and Selection of firefighters in the City of Springfield, 24 MCSR 627 (2011)(investigation of hiring led by Deputy Fire Chief that resulted in his sons appointment, required reconsideration of many candidates in a new hiring cycle to be conducted by outsiders); and In Re: 2011 Review and Selection of Permanent Intermittent Police Officers By the town of Oxford, CSC No.

Millis School Committee, 23 MLC 99 (1996) (school committee bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member to determine the method by which he would repay a retirement stipend); City of Springfield, 17 MLC 1380 (1990) (city bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member about the conditions under which he would return to work and his benefits terminated).

Millis School Committee, 23 MLC 99 (1996) (school committee bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member to determine the method by which he would repay a retirement stipend); City of Springfield, 17 MLC 1380 (1990) (city bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member about the conditions under which he would return to work and his benefits terminated).

Millis School Committee, 23 MLC 99 (1996) (school committee bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member to determine the method by which he would repay a retirement stipend); City of Springfield, 17 MLC 1380 (1990) (city bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member about the conditions under which he would return to work and his benefits terminated).

Millis School Committee, 23 MLC 99 (1996) (school committee bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member to determine the method by which he would repay a retirement stipend); City of Springfield, 17 MLC 1380 (1990) (city bypassed the union and negotiated directly with a bargaining unit member about the conditions under which he would return to work and his benefits terminated).