lv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING 17. Name 18. Representative to contact Canton Teachers Assn 19. PARTY 20. Telephone Number Richard A. Mullane 617-878-8281 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

Poores grievance, the Union withdrew from the settlement involving Ms. Crowe and asked the DLR to reopen the case involving Ms. Crowe. Pending the resolution of that matter, Haverhill continued to keep Ms. Crowe in a part-time position in the Water Billing Department and put Ms. Poores layoff on hold. (Exhs.24 & 43; Testimony of Appellant; Testimony of Carrington; Testimony of Crowe) 50.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.

Memorandum of Agreement Between the City of Newton and the Newton Police Association The City of Newton (the City) and the Newton Police Association (the Union or the NPA) (collectively, the Parties) hereby agree to the following terms as full and final settlement of the charge of Prohibited Practice filed with the Depariment of Lavor Relations (DLR) as case # MUP-12-1652.

Note: The OLR may decline lo issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an: O Individual Emptoyee Organization O Employer ' w w 40. Name 42.

SUP-20-7926 Roberts: On behalf of the Jail Officers and Employees Association of Suffolk County, I hereby request leave to withdraw the above-referenced charge of prohibited practice pursuant to a settlement agreement. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, Kristen A. Barnes KAB/rw cc: James Sunkenberg, Esq. (Via PDF E-Mail) Melissa Garand, Esq. (Via PDF E-Mail) Michael J.

' Yes : Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. | j|No 456 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY be Name 18. | Jail Officers & Employees Association of Representative to contact 20. Alan J. McDonald Suffolk County (JOEASC) :19.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge toa Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (D, Employee Organization (0), I| Employer (E): ; | _ i 40. Name re Representative tocontact Arthur Bacon David J. Fried, Esq. 42.

The Last Chance Agreement In lieu of terminating Officer Bacon, the Employer entered into a settlement agreement with him and the Union on August 15, 2015, which stated, in pertinent part: Officer Arthur Bacon acknowledges that he violated Department Policies $220 and $521* on March 8, 2015 when he possessed an unauthorized cellphone while working in the 21-22 Unit of the Jail, and on June 18, 2015 while assigned to the Boston Medical Center when

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 2 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), |O '40. Name Springfield School Custodians Association |42. Telephone Number 413-455-1730 Employer (E): 41.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.

Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING 17. Name 18. Representative to contact Massachusetts Teachers Association 19, PARTY 20.

The rationale behind the policy is to encourage the prompt and effective settlement of public sector disputes utilizing binding grievance and arbitration procedures. Here, there is no dispute that a grievance was filed by the Union on March 31, 2014 regarding the Colleges attempt to fully utilize the MOAT system with bargaining unit members. In fact, the provisions of the CBA were referenced on multiple communications from the Union.

SUP-14-4201 and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOTION TO WITHDRAW CHARGE Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the Union withdraws its charge of prohibited practice in the above captioned matter. Respectfully submitted, For the United Steel Workers, Local 5696 By its attorney, /s/ Dennis M. Coyne Dennis M.

Thereafter, the parties reached a settlement agreement under which MassDOT agreed to withdraw OConnors discipline. 10. On October 7, 2014, Bartholomew emailed Tynes because USW had not yet received a revised version of the Forced Overtime Policy for its review. Bartholomew reiterated that USW and MassDOT had agreed that the Forced Overtime Policy could remain in effect as a guideline only and that no discipline would be issued under that policy.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

A settlement of the dispute at this level shall not establish precedent for the resolution of other or similar problems between the employee and his immediate supervisor or elsewhere throughout the Commission. Section 3.