See also City of Somerville, 24 MLC 69, 71 (1997) (Discussion of appropriate bargaining unit determination for 911 dispatchers in municipal police operation). The bargaining histories and recognition agreements of the public safety and classified bargaining units at the UMass campus are a strange and complex narrative.

Thus, while the Board placed dispatchers into their own bargaining unit instead of in a wall-to-wall city-wide unit in City of Somerville, 24 MLC (1998), it also denied petitions seeking units in Town of Marblehead, 27 MLC MCR-09-5360 dispatchers UMass (April 5, 2010). and Lowell, uniformed to sever dispatchers 142, MCR-4799 from CAS-3217 civilian wall-to-wall (2001) and City of Worcester, And, critical to this case, it granted a petition severing

City of Somerville, 2019 WL 2083385, at *9- *10 (Civ. Serv. Commn) (citing cases, including LaChance v. Erickson, 522 U.S. 262, 268 (1998), for the propositions that lying in a disciplinary investigation alone is ground for termination and the discharges of police officers based upon their dishonesty often will be upheld by the Commission).

Murray Supervisor of Records October 14, 2021 SPR21/2627 Joseph Tringale Records Access Officer Somerville Public Schools 8 Bonair Street Somerville, MA 02145 Dear Mr.

Telephone Number Priyadarshini Kumar 617-947-9028 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 34B Marshall Street, Somerville MA 10. Fax Number 02145 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12.

Boston School Committee 2300 Washington Street Roxbury, MA 02119 Pryadarshini Kumar 34B Marshall Street Somerville, MA 02145 RE: MUP-19-7438, Boston School Committee Dear Mr. Hasson and Ms.

City of Somerville, G1-11-145 at 17 (Nov. 29, 2012)(citation and internal quotation marks omitted). I do not have the details of any investigation into Candidate JAs failure to attend a recertification course. It appears that his answer to Question 3 on his Employment Application Package was untruthful. However, his list of involvement with the police and incidents demonstrating disregard for the law was much shorter than Mr. Lazazzeros list.

City of Somerville v. Somerville Municipal Employees Assn, 20 Mass.App.Ct. 594, 598, 481 N.E.2d 1176, 1180-81, rev.den., 396 Mass. 1102, 484 N.E.2d 103 (1985) citing McLaughlin v. Commissioner of Pub. Works, 204 Mass. 27, 29, 22 N.E.2d 613 (1939).

As the Arbitration Panel in City of Somerville JLMC-114-4174 recognized: An arbitrator is reluctant to modify contract provisions where the parties, in past years, have already reached agreement, the contract article has been in the contract for a considerable period of time, and there has been no ascertainable problem with the contract language. Thus, there is no reason to change the current contract language on this issue. IV.

City of Somerville, 23 MLC 256, 259 (1997). Rather, the employer is only required to bargain if there is a calculated displacement of unit work. Town of Bridgewater, 23 MLC 103, 104 (1998).

City of Somerville v. Somerville Municipal Employees Assn, 1102 (1985) citing McLaughlin 20 Mass.App.Ct. v. Commissioner 594, 598, rev.den., 396 Mass. of Pub. Works, 204 Mass. 27, 29 (1939).

See City of Somerville, MUP-144083, 2016 WL 6575062 (Oct. 12, 2016) (no violation for failing to impact bargain where there were no identifiable impacts on terms and conditions of work). Despite not having an obligation to bargain, it is worth noting that the employer has communicated with the Union regarding its plans and educational policy goals.