City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446, 448 (2015). Reasonable description of records Items (h) (j) Regarding the above Items, the Office stated that [i]t is unclear from your request what is meant by departmental records. To the extent that this request seeks investigatory records retained by a department(s) of this Office, we understand this to be duplicative of your broader request for all files related to the investigation.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

Lizotte v City of New Bedford Police Department 12 MCSR 40 (1999). An Appellant's "expectation of selection based on his position on a civil service list does not rise to the level of a property list entitled to constitutional protection." Stuart v. Roache, 951 IF. 2d 446 (1st Cir. 1991). It is a limited preference to be considered for appointment rather than a right to be hired.

November 21, 2000; City of New Bedford, 15 MLC 1732, 1737, MUP-6488, May 31, 1989. The Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (CERB) analysis focuses on the pre-existing pattern of shared work and the impact that any change in that pattern may have on the allegedly aggrieved party. See City of Boston, 26 MLC 144, 147, MUP-1085, March 10, 2000; Town of Natick, 11 MLC 1434, 1438, MUP-5319, February 19, 1985.

City of New Bedford, 23 MCSR 134 (2010). See also ONeill v. City of Lowell, 21 MCSR 683 (2008), affd sub nom ONeill v. Civil Service Commn, MICV2009-00391 (Sup.Ct. 2009) (Chernoff, J.) (The statute gives the Commission the power to initiate an investigation upon request . . . but does not require it to do so.) affd, 78 Mass.App.Ct. 1127 (2011); Memorandum and Decision in Boston Patrolmens Association v.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

Sacco & Collins, P.C. msacco@msaccolaw.net RE: Open Meeting Law Complaint Dear Attorney Sacco: This office received a complaint from the City of New Bedford Solicitors Office (the Complainant) 1 on April 24, 2024, 2 alleging that the New Bedford Retirement Board (the Board), and specifically the Boards chair, violated the Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, 18-25.

Assistant District Attorney Bristol County District Attorneys Office 888 Purchase Street New Bedford, MA 02740 Dear Attorney Almeida: I have received the petition of Colman Herman appealing the response of the Bristol County District Attorneys Office (Office) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On November 20, 2022, Mr.