such issues as may be submitte d to him/her by the written agreement of the parties. 7.03.02 Grievances may be settled without precedent at any stage of the procedure until the issuance of a final award by the arbitrator. 7.04 Exceptions 7.04.01 Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, any matter which is subject to the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission, any Retirement Board establis hed by law, the Massachusetts Commission
She also filed three complaints at the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination. 3 The prediscipline offer secured by the union called for four and one-half months of severance pay, no record of discipline, a neutral recommendation from Lovley, and access to the university's electronic resources for use in her search for a new position. 4 2 At the plaintiff's request, the union filed a grievance of the suspension, and pursued it unsuccessfully
Sinapah against the University at the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination (MCAD). 3 Letter of Dismissal (cont'd) SUP-15-4454 Sinapahs grievances to arbitration. The September 30, 2014 letter explained the reasons for this decision, namely; that the UAW believed that Dr.
Sinapah having filed two grievances with PRO-UAW and also in retaliation for her filing other complaints with the Massachusetts Commission againstDiscrimination (MCAD) against the University related to her employment in the . Department of Microbiology. 6 Dismissal The Investigator concluded that Dr. Sinapah did not establish a prima facie case of discrimination in violation of Section 10(a)(3) of the Law.
Sinapah has filed four separate amended complaints at the Mass Commission AgainstDiscrimination. The fourth complaint was filed on June 5, 2015 docketed under MCAD # 15SEM02918 which asserts the same set of allegations against the University concerning the Universitys decision to decline Dr. Sinapahs request to have her J-1 sponsorship extended. The University filed a response to this complaint on August 7, 2015. Similarly, Dr.
In a July 7, 2017 e-mail, the Investigator stated that he had reviewed his notes regarding the exhibit list and that Sinapah had submitted Charging Patiy Exhibit 5 to demonstrate Sinapah's opinion that the grievance over her suspension was still pending and to demonstrate the University's alleged retaliation towards her. 12 Specifically referenced in the release were claims that Sinapahhad filed against the University at the Massachusetts Commission
Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, 431 Mass. 655, 667 (2000) (citing Johansen v. NCR Comten, Inc. (Johansen), 30 Mass. App. Ct. 294, 300 (1991). While direct evidencethe proverbial smoking gunis rare (and in the instant case, non-existent), indirect evidence may be established through circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence that shows unlawful motivation.
Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, 431 Wynn, Mass. 655, 667 n. 23 (2000)). Absent direct evidence of unlawful motivation, the charging party may establish unlawful motivation through circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence.
The Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination (MCAD) Boston Office: One Ashburton Place, Rm. 601, Boston, MA 02108, (617) 727-3990. Springfield Office: 424 Dwight Street, Rm. 220, Springfield, MA 01103, (413) 739-2145. Worcester Office: 22 Front Street, Fifth Floor, PO Box 8038, Worcester, MA 01641, (S08) 799-6379.
On or about May 29, 2012, Emerson filed a discrimination complaint with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination (MCAD) regarding Officer Taylors treatment of co-workers and other persons in the workplace. Emerson also filed an unfair labor practice charge against Massport, UP-12-1883, at the Department.
The parties agree to abide by the statutory provision and 149, Section 105D of the General Laws of Massachusetts and any applicable rules ation. regulations of the Massachusetts Commission againstDiscrimin Maternity leave may be extended at the discretion of the Superintendent. she shall return to the If a teacher returns to school in the same year as the maternity leave, maternity same teaching assignment.
MCAD - One Ashburton Place, Room 601, Boston, MA 02108 Carmen Zayas, Investigating Commissioner (617) 994-6024 (Fax) Daniel Sullivan Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination Daniel Sullivan, Vs. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public Health Tewksbury State Hospital MCAD No: !
He went to the union and filed a compliant with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination (MCAD), which he later dropped. Lyford testimony. On October 11, 2006, he emailed Mayor Forgey, Chief Cogswell, and the Chiefs assistant Diane Lively asking them to look into whether the union contract was being violated by the Departments handling of sleeping arrangements for female firefighters. Respondents Ex. 10.
Any person who files a discrimination or retaliation claim at the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission, any court, or any other forum shall have no recourse to the grievance and arbitration procedure set forth in Article 3 with regard to the employment actions or subject matters on which the claim is based.
or sex. b) The Town and the Union agree that if the effects of employment practices, regardless of their intent, discriminate against any group of people on the basis of race, religion, creed, color, national origin or sex, then specific positive and aggressive measures must be taken to eliminate discrimination and to ensure equal opportunity. c) The Town and the Union agree that in order to adhere to the Town's Agreement with the Massachusetts Commission