G1-13-280 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Pro Se Katelyn Marino Appearance for Respondent: Joseph Santoro Department of Correction P.O. Box 946: Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Katelyn Marino (Ms.

G2-12-6 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Brian V. Jansen, Esq. 159 South Main Street, Suite A Milford, MA 01757 Appearances for Respondent: Earl Wilson, Esq. Director of Employee Relations Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Paul M. Stein1 DECISION Procedural History Pursuant to G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Mr. Raymond Mason (Appellant or Mr.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent DECISION Pursuant G.L. c. 31, 2(b) and/or G.L. c. 7, 4H, a Magistrate from the Division of CITY OF to SOMERVILLE, Administrative Law Appeals (DALA), was assigned to conduct a full evidentiary hearing regardingRespondent this matter on behalf of the Civil Service Commission (Commission). Pursuant to 801 CMR 1.01 (11) (c), the Magistrate issued the attached Tentative Decision to the Commission.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent G1-14-153 Appearance for Appellant: Pro Se Jesse Monteiro Appearance for Respondent: Jeffrey S. Bolger, Esq. Department of Correction P.O. Box 946, Industries Dr. Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Paul M. Stein1 DECISION The Appellant, Jesse Monteiro (Mr.

G1-12-114 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Pro Se Axel Morse Appearance for Respondent: Earl Wilson, Esq. Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA Commissioner: Cynthia A. Ittleman, Esq.! DECISION On March 21, 2012, the Appellant, Axel Morse (Mr.

Department of Correction DALA Docket No. CS-12-636 CSC Docket No. G2-12-206 Dear Chairman Bowman: Enclosed please find the Recommended Decision that is being issued today. The parties are advised that, pursuant to 801 CMR 1.01(11)(c)(1), they have thirty days to file written objections to the decision with the Civil Service Commission. written objections may be accompanied by supporting briefs. .

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Petitioner: Pro se ; Appearance for Respondent: mt wy oe Oo ; rw = OO7 Jeffrey S. Bolger e Division of Human Resources Sia Ww Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Angela McConney Scheepers, Esq. SUMMARY OF TENTATIVE DECISION The Department of Correction had reasonable justification to bypass the Appellant for promotion to Correction Officer II.

CASE NO: G2-11-323 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Joseph A. Padolsky, Esq. Louison, Costello. Condon & Pfaff, LLP 101 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Respondents Attorney: Earl Wilson, Esq. Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Industrial Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Paul M.

G1-11-176 Department of Correction, Respondent Appellant: Seta Phay, pro se Respondent: Jeffrey S. Bolger Director of Employee Relations Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Daniel M.

G1-13-37 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Brian Pimentel Pro Se Respondents Representative: Kerri A. Rice Department of Correction P.O. Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Cynthia A. Ittleman1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Brian Pimentel (hereinafter Mr.