COMMONWEALTH CIVIL SERVICE OF MASSACHUSETTS __ Decision mailed: al al | COMMISSION Civil Service Commission One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 JUAN Room 503 ROSARIO, Appellant ae Case No.: G2-10-33 SPRINGFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent DECISION After careful review and consideration, the Civil Service Commission voted at an executive session on April 7, 2011 to acknowledge receipt of the report of the Administrative Law Magistrate

Si he Commenweatth of Mas 5 achus ett, Decision malted: /0| 30/04 Civil Service romney, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 LAWRENCE D.

By vote of the Civil Service Commission (Bowman, Chairman; Ittleman, Marquis, McDowell and Stein, Commissioners) on January 10, 2013. A true record. Attest. Christopher Chairman C. Bowman Ola tevin Either party may file a motion for reconsideration within ten days of the receipt of this Commission order or decision. Under the pertinent provisions of the Code of Mass.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Civil Service Commission,9 One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 WILLIAM ROSA, JR., Appellant wy: Case No.: G1-10-76 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent DECISION After careful review and consideration, the Civil Service Commission voted at an executive session on March 10, 2011 to acknowledge receipt of the report of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated January 20, 2011.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 THOMAS FENNELLY, Appellant Case No.: G1-13-233 v.

Mis % TMB CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and NIASSACHUSETTS REHABILITATION COMMISSION TAT.G.u (uty ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS After a hearing and review of all of the materials submitted, the Court concludes that the decision of the Civil Service Commission must be affirmed as I find that there were reasonable justifications for the hiring decisions of the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission and that the plaintiff has

Decision mailed: to Civil Service Commission CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 WILLIAM SCANLAN, Appellant vy D-06-310 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Regina M. Ryan Louison, Costello, Condon, and Pfaff 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Respondents Attorney: Andrew McAleen Department of Correction P.O.

The many problems with this document are these: The Malden Fire Department did not inform the Civil Service Commission or the Division of Administrative Law Appeals that it could not comply with the discovery order ~ and that if it could comply, it would not comply with what it calls the second request. The Malden Fire Department made an objection about privilege but not to the Civil Service Commission, which could actually have ruled on it.

Since the Appellant has also filed a discrimination complaint with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination regarding the same issue, the Civil Service Commission is dismissing this appeal until the MCAD has issued a final decision on the Appellants complaint.

The Appellant filed a timely appeal with the Civil Service Commission. A pre-hearing conference was conducted at the offices of the Civil Service Commission on April 24, 2006 before Commissioner Marquis. On October 11, 2005, the Town sought approval from the Personnel Administrator (HRD) to bypass the Appellant for original appointment as police officer. Their justification was three-fold.