COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Re: Daniel Sullivan ) ) NAGE ) And ) ) DANIEL SULLIVAN ) DLROCT1614pH1:14 ) And ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Public Health Tewksbury State Hospital ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Health/Tewksbury State Hospital (Hospital or Commonwealth or Department), NAGE (the Union), and Daniel Sullivan desire an amicable settlement of all claims which

*Department of Labor Relations Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Health is co-partners and a contributory party to force the two complaints out of employment. Martha OConnor Administration Labor Relations Department of Public Health. Deborah Crory Labor Relations Specialist, Department of Public Health.

(Exh. 6) The Department of Public Health affirmed and accepted the DALA decision on January 17, 2013. (Exh. 7) 29. The DALA decision also ordered Mr. Hogan to retrain in the fields where he showed deficits before having his license renewed. The decision to grant medical control would be solely up to the AHMD. (Testimony of Mr. Hogan; Exh. 6) 30. In compliance with the DALA decision, Mr.

Section 6: In the event that an Employee receives a positive test result, the Employee must report the positive result in the City of Worcesters Vaccine Verification Portal, or, if unable to do so, notify the Human Resources Department, and must isolate at home in accordance with the guidance issued from the City of Worcester Department of Public Health.

Section 6: In the event that an Employee receives a positive test result, the Employee must report the positive result in the City of Worcesters Vaccine Verification Portal, or, if unable to do so, notify the Human Resources Department, and must isolate at home in accordance with the guidance issued from the City of Worcester Department of Public Health.

Various local public officials and members of other state agencies and organizations attended the meeting, including Holyoke's Mayor, Police Chief, City Solicitor, Superintendent of the Department of Public Works, as well as the President and CEO of Tapestry Health, the Director of the Center for Education Prevention and Action, and the Director of the Bureau of Infectious Disease at the Department of Public Health.

Further, in Department of Public Health, the Supreme Judicial Court described additional factors to consider when analyzing privacy issues: (1) the extent to which multiple indices could be compared to reveal private information, (2) the availability from other sources of the information in the requested indices, (3) the risk from disclosure of identity theft or fraud, and (4) the extent to which disclosure could result in unwanted intrusions.

Wallack requested the following records: Application materials filed by entities seeking permission to open a registered medical dispensary, including the initial application and any supplementary, updated, or additional material provided to the Department of Public Health or the Cannabis Control Commission.

These updates were made at various times to the staffs of the Secretary of Veteran Services, the Executive Office of Health and Human Services and the Department of Public Health. . . . Please provide me with hard copies and electronic copies of the above communications as they relate to the Executive Office of Health and Human Services.

These updates were made at various times to the staffs of the Secretary of Veteran Services, the Executive Office of Health and Human Services and the Department of Public Health. . . . Please provide me with hard copies and electronic copies of the above communications as they relate to the Executive Office of Health and Human Services. Previous appeal The requested records were the subject of a previous appeal.

Department of Public Health, 12 MCSR 49 (1999) (at least 50%); Kennedy v. Holyoke Community College, 11 MCSR 302 (1998) (at least 50%). ANALYSIS As is often true in most classification appeals, Ms. McKinnon is, by all accounts, a dedicated public servant who works hard at her job.

OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUP-22-9097 CHARGING PARTY'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW NOW COMES the Charging Party, AFSCME Council 93 (hereinafter "Charging Party" or "Union") and pursuant to 456 CMR 15.05(9), respectfully requests that the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (hereinafter "CERB") review the Dismissal of the Charge set forth in SUP-22-9097.

Additionally, the Charge must be dismissed because additional contractors were utilized to fill on-going staff-shortages during the ongoing public health emergency, and such use of contractors in addition to bargaining unit members does not transfer bargaining unit work at all, let alone to the detriment of the bargaining members, where the Union Facility Service Workers at the Shattuck Hospital are a group of employees employed under the purview of the Department

It alleged that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, acting through the Department of Public Health (Employer or DPH), violated Section 10(a)(5) and, derivatively, Section 10(a)(1) of M.G. L. c. 150E (the Law) when, after the Governor of Massachusetts lifted the COVID-19 state of emergency, it continued to use outside contractors to perform janitorial bargaining unit work at Lemuel Shattuck Hospital (Shattuck).

Rush-Lloyd: I have received the petition of Greg Hard appealing the response of the Department of Public Health (Depa1iment/DPH) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 1OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Hard initially requested the following records: 1) The number of all confirmed vape related respiratory illnesses discovered by DPH in the past 60 days.