Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster y, Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighted by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. City of Cambridge, 43 Mass. App. Ct. at 304, quoting Selectman of Wakefield v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighted by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. City of Cambridge, 43 Mass. App. Ct. at 304, quoting Selectman of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Id. at 187 (quoting City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev. den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003)). The commissions task, however, is not to be accomplished on a wholly blank slate. Falmouth v. Civil Serv. Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006).

City of Leominster v. International Bhd., Local 338, 33 Mass.App.Ct. 121, 127, 596 N.E.1032, 1035, rev.den., 413 Mass. 1106, 600 N.E.2d 1000 (1992). See also Kilmartin y. Lowell Police Dept, 10 MCSR 89 (1997); Lucero v. City of Revere, MCSR 200 (1995); Whalen v. City of Quincy, 7 MCSR 271 (1994). 37 8 The facts of this case leave little doubt that Mr.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

See City of Leominster, 19 MLC 1636 (1993) (the long-term practice of the 3 police department to make shift assignments according to a system of strict seniority 4 preference on an annual basis is a mandatory subject of bargaining); see also; Town of 5 Tewksbury, 10 MLC 1517 (1984) aff'd., 11 MLC 1170 (1984) (town unlawfully changed 6 consistent past practice of assigning patrol officers to the day shift on the basis of 7 seniority). 8 To determine

City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003)(dealing with Commissions review of Persorinel Administrators decision on discipline/removal). Hearings before the Commission are governed by the Standard Adjudicatory rules 801 CMR 1.01 which contemplate a full hearing on the merits.

Miner New England Joint Board RWDSU/UFCW, Local 60 14 Manning Avenue, Suite 302 Leominster, MA 01453 Re: MUPL-22-9184, RWDSU/UFCW, Local 60 Dear Mr. Johnson and Mr. Miner: On March 18, 2022, Daniel W.

See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, rev.den., 390 Mass. 1102 (1983).