Should the Appellant seek to revoke this dismissal at that time, the Commission will weigh MCADs decision appropriately while conducting further proceedings on the Appellants just-cause appeal, guided in part by the Supreme Judicial Courts framework outlined in Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021).

Should the Appellant seek to revoke this dismissal at that time, the Commission will weigh MCADs decision appropriately while conducting further proceedings on the Appellants just-cause appeal, guided in part by the Supreme Judicial Courts framework outlined in Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021).

Should the Appellant seek to revoke this dismissal at that time, the Commission will weigh MCADs decision appropriately while conducting further proceedings on the Appellants just-cause appeal, guided in part by the Supreme Judicial Courts framework outlined in Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021).

Should the Appellant seek to revoke this dismissal at that time, the Commission will weigh MCADs decision appropriately while conducting further proceedings on the Appellants just-cause appeal, guided in part by the Supreme Judicial Courts framework outlined in Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021).

See also Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.

Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278, 294-97 (2021).

Houlihan, Kraft & Cardinal 229 Harvard Street Brookline, MA 02446 Appearance for Respondent: Robert J. Boyle, Jr., Esq. City of Boston Office of Labor Relations Boston City Hall Boston, MA 02201 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION AFTER SECOND REMAND These appeals were first filed with the Civil Service Commission (Commission) approximately ten (10) years ago.

Zarceno Lopez Marie Craig Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Brookline, MA 02446 Brookline, MA 02446 Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01701 Wellesley Hills, MA Framingham, MA Framingham,MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01701 Hopkinton, MA 01746 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01702 Ashland, MA 01721

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records April 29, 2025 SPR25/1076 Amanda Williams Records Clerk Brookline Police Department 350 Washington Street Brookline, MA 02445 Dear Ms. Williams: I have received the petition of Alfred DiGregorio appealing the response of the Brookline Police Department (Department) to a request for public records.

Town of Brookline, 23 MCSR 749 (2010). See also City of Attleboro v. Civil Service Commn, 84 Mass.App.Ct. 1130 (Rule 1:28), rev.den., 462 Mass. 1104 (2014) (reversing Commissions modification of motor equipment operator who lost CDL license for 90 days) 16 involved in the investigation or decision that led to Mr. Hatfields termination empathized with the personal tragedy, and no one was motivated by any animus or bias toward him.