City of Everett vs, New England Police Benevolent Assn, CERB Case No, 13-3006 (2016) Il , THE CITYS ACTION AGAINST MR, ESOLDI WAS UNLAWFULLY MOTIVATED BY HIS EXERCISE OF HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY It is well known that a public employee cannot be subjected to adverse job action because of the exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment. Peabody, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 573 (2000). See generally Howcroft vs.

City of Everett, 26 MLC 25 (1999); Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 18 MLC 1161, 1163 (1991). The Union argues that the Agreement requires the Town to reinstate one of the four employees, Dale Webber (Webber), to a position in the Parks Division rather than the Tree/Forestry Division.

In the addendum, the Appellant wrote that he lived at an address in New Hampshire from July 2018 through May 2019, in addition to staying in a shelter in Boston at times from March 2019-May 2019.24 The Appellant provided some proof that he paid excise taxes to the City of Everett in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and that he garaged his vehicle in the City of Everett from November 2017 through January 2019 and then again from March 2019 through September

City of Everett, 7 99 (1996). The usual remedy for a direct dealing violation is a cease and desist order (see Town of Randolph, 23 H.O. Decision (cont'd) MUP-07-4990 8 MLC 2054-2055), and | see no reason to depart from that remedy here.

Melrose, MA 02176 Office: (781) 662-4934 Fax: (781) 662-4711 10/10/2014 Regarding: Rico Venturelli DOB: 03/11/1961 28 Hoyt St Everett, MA 02149 To Whom It May Concern: Mr.

City of Everett, 26 MLC 25, 27, MUP-1542 (July 22, 1999). The Union argued that the Employer violated the parties ground rules when Peloquin informed Coogan that a change in location for contract negotiations constituted a unilateral change and demanded to hold the negotiations at the Employers offices.

City of Everett, 30 MCSR 277 (2017); Lydon v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 18 MCSR 216 (2005). Accord Milliken & Co., v. Duro Textiles LLC, 451 Mass. 547, 550 n.6 (2008); Maimonides School v. Coles, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 240, 249 (2008). See also Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co., 451 Mass. 623, 635-36 (2008) (discussing standard for deciding motions to dismiss); cf. R.J.A. v.

Murray Supervisor of Records July 5, 2022 SPR22/1441 Captain Scott Stallbaum Everett Police Department 45 Elm Street Everett, MA 02149 Dear Captain Stallbaum: I have received the petition of Wayne Napolitano appealing the nonresponse of the Everett Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 3, 2022, Mr.

Scott Stallbaum Everett Police Department 45 Elm Street Everett, MA 02149 July 7, 2022 SPR22/1438 Dear Capt. Stallbaum: I have received the petition of Wayne Napolitano appealing the nonresponse of the Everett Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on June 3, 2022, Mr.

Scott Stallbaum Everett Police Department 45 Elm Street Everett, MA 02149 July 7, 2022 SPR22/1439 Dear Capt. Stallbaum: I have received the petition of Wayne Napolitano appealing the nonresponse of the Everett Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on June 3, 2022, Mr.