City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 26 MCSR 398 (2013); Allen v. Taunton Public Schools, 26 MCSR 376 (2013) affd sub nom, Allen v. Civil Service Commn, C.A. 2013SUCV3239 (Memorandum of Decision, July 17, 2014); Okoroafor v. Department of Mental Health, 21 MCSR 195 (2008) Even assuming the Commission were to look only at the second layoff notice, that would lead to the same conclusion. Ms.

Best regards, -Sheila Sheila A, Kearns, M.Ed, | AESCME Council 93 South Shore/Metro Staff Representative 908 Purchase Street, "4 Floar, New Bedford, MA 02740 Ww: 508.250.2048 | F 508.991.4266 This message (including any attachments) may contain privileged/confidential information and may be subject to legal privilege.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). Exemption (d) Exemption (d) allows the withholding of: inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters relating to policy positions being developed by the agency; but this subclause shall not apply to reasonably completed factual studies or reports on which the development of such policy positions has been or may be based G. L. C. 4, 7(26)(d).

City of New Bedford and/or are privileged attorney-client communications . . . In our experience, however, during our review we sometimes find records or portions thereof that are statutorily exempt from disclosure, for example criminal offender record information (CORI), tax information, personal data, and personal information, to name a few. The public records law allows custodians to charge for the segregation of these records.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

Smith, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 813, 815 (2003) (if [the employee] was not tenured, then the [Civil Service] Commission lacked jurisdiction to hear his appeal); City of New Bedford v.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446,448 (2015)." In DaRosa, the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that "opinion" work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). DaRosa, 471 Mass. at 448. It also concluded that "fact" work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.