City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3) that was prepared in Andrew Doherty, Esq.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 33 MCSR 285 (2020) and Reynolds v. City of Brockton, 37 MCSR 37 (2024) (Commission dismissed subsequent bypass appeal as it had upheld same reasons in prior bypass decided by Commission months earlier).

Box 973 New Bedford, MA 02740 Dear Attorney Cho: I have received the petition of Todd Wallack of the Boston Globe appealing the response of the Office of the District Attorney Bristol District (DAO) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Wallack requested any and all records pertaining to Aaron Hernandez. Mr.

Box 973 New Bedford, MA 02740 Dear Attorney Cho: I have received the petition of Todd Wallack of the Boston Globe appealing the response of the Office of the District Attorney - Bristol District (DAO) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Wallack requested "any and all records" pertaining to Aaron Hernandez. Mr.

FAX Number 27 South Street New Bedford MA 02740 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 24, Name 25. Telephone Number George Belanger 508-287-1059 a 26, 27,28,29. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 27 South Street New Bedford MA 02740 - 130. FAX Number | 32. Firm/Organization Name | | Teamsters Union Local 59 31. E- mail Address teamsters.nb@verizon.net 33.

City of New Bedford, CSC Case No. G1-08-234, 22 MCSR --- (2009), the Commission recently considered a question similar to the question presented here. Almeida was a case in which an employee in the labor service was laid off from his position as a Bus Operator and claimed bumping rights to be demoted to lesser skilled labor service job(s) in different job title(s) that were held by more junior labor service employee(s).

See, e.g., City of New Bedford, MUP-09-5582 (Nov. 15, 2012) (employer presented union with fait accompli when it identified employees to be laid off only a few days before the layoffs occurred); Town of Hudson, MUP1714 (Apr. 1, 1999) (same, nine-day period between initial notice of employers intent to implement detail policy and effective date of policy); Town of Mansfield, MUP-1567 (Aug. 4, 1998) (same, seven-day period between initial notice and

See City of New Bedford, 38 MLC 205, 208 (2012). (Internal citation omitted). The initial inquiry of a waiver by contract analysis must focus solely on the language of the contract. City of Newton, 35 MLC 142; 2008 MLRC LEXIS 23, 24 (2008) (where contract language is not ambiguous, it is necessary only to examine the specificity of the clause and to determine whether the disputed action is within its scope).

See, e.g., City of New Bedford, MUP-09-5582 (Nov. 15, 2012) (employer presented union with fait accompli when it identified employees to be laid off only a few days before the layoffs occurred); Town of Hudson, MUP1714 (Apr. 1, 1999) (same, nine-day period between initial notice of employers intent to implement detail policy and effective date of policy); Town of Mansfield, MUP-1567 (Aug. 4, 1998) (same, seven-day period between initial notice and

See City of New Bedford, 38 MLC 205, 208 (2012). (Internal citation omitted). The initial inquiry of a waiver by contract analysis must focus solely on the language of the contract. City of Newton, 35 MLC 142; 2008 MLRC LEXIS 23, 24 (2008) (where contract language is not ambiguous, it is necessary only to examine the specificity of the clause and to determine whether the disputed action is within its scope).

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.