. : (_]appeat Estimated time spenton settlement: ; Pre-Hearing Conference ; Appropriate Remedies - 5 - CJ Proposing Settlement Language im Drafting Settlement Agreement EeNone K : Vy, 2UCS Did you receive a copy ofthe settlement agreement?

While Reuter's appeal was pending before the Commission, Commission further determined that termination of Reuter's employment was not precluded by the settlement agreement the parties had executed approximately one year prior to Reuter's conviction.

The Town and the Union engaged in successor collective bargaining negotiations resulting in a settlement agreement in June of 2022. The membership voted on and ratified the agreement from 7/11/22-7144/22 via on online opa vote system. On July 14, 2022, the Employer's aitomey forwarded a revised settlement agreement to the Union's representative.

Singh, Samantha (DLR) From: Sent: donna Drea Saturday, August 11, 2018 10:06 PM To: Efile DLR (EOL) Subject: No show cause As the union, and I have come to a settlement prior to the hearing date. there will be no need to pursue these charges further, I'd like to thank all of you at the NLRB, you were very instrumental in initiating this settlement agreement, thank you D. Drea

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (QO), Employer (I): | 40. Name Donna Jean drea 42. Telephone Number 41.

The Union appeared at the in-person investigation conference on August 8, 2018, and presented evidence that it had reached a settlement agreement with you. However, you did not appear at the in-person investigation conference on August 8, 2018. Accordingly, the DLR directs that you show cause why it should not dismiss the Charge.

Co settlement agreement with Ms. Wong and Ms. Stamper; and we spoke by telephone with you in December 2011, January 2012, and June 2012. Following our review, we fmd that the Council did not violate the Open Meeting Law by withholding minutes from eight executive session meetings until certain litigation was resolved. FACTS Based upon our review of the material listed above, the facts are as follows.

In executive session, the Board discussed the terms of a legal settlement offer that the Town later offered to a former town employee, Joe Colby. As the Boards executive session minutes have not been released, we do not describe the discussion in detail here. At 6:00 p.m., the Boards Chair convened an open session in Room 200 at the Town House.

The 9/19 letter encouraged me to initiate a settlement, & | feel it misrepresented Arbitrator Cochran's ruling. | do not feel as the award has been implemented.| declined to initiate a settlement, but was open to hearing of a settlement initiated by the District. On 9/24, | was informed of additional conversation of settlement via Mr. Dunn. | attended a meeting on 10/8 to discuss settlement or my return to the District.

We would be willing for instance to review a settlement offer, in addition to the back pay due to her, in order to end her employment on mutually beneficial terms. On September 24, 2013, Dunn communicated to Dababneh that the School had inquired if she was interested in resigning in exchange for money. On September 26, 2014, Dababneh responded to Dunn and expressed her interest in returning to her position.

ATB Settlement c. Fiscal Year 2015 Department Budget d. South Park Pro Forma."3 During the February 4 meeting, the Board discussed business in open session before reaching the executive session portion of the meeting. Prior to entering into executive session, the Board Chair asked for a motion to enter into executive session to discuss abatements, the ATB settlement, the fiscal year 2015 department budget, and the South Park pro forma.

On July 27, 2018, the parties entered into a settlement agreement and the court dismissed the case several days later. Pursuant to the agreement, if either towns residents rejected the proposal at Town Meeting, the parties had the option of moving the court to vacate the judgment of dismissal within 30 days. On October 15, 2018, the Town of Wilbraham held its Town Meeting and rejected the proposed amendment to the regional school agreement.

The parties also executed a side letter to the agreement, which addresses the settlement of these charges and other issues. Both the CBA and the side letter were signed by the Sheriff and the Union President on December 29, 2015. However, both the CBA and the settlement of these charges are contingent on the Commonwealth funding the CBA.

Yes LJ No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by 456 CMR 15.04(1). the charging party. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Essex Co. Regional Emergency Comm. Dispatchers | Daniel Fogart y 19. 617.523.2500 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21. Fax Number 44 School St. Ste 1100 Boston MA 02108 22.