Town ofBrookline, 23 MCSR 749 (2010) (failure to obtain hoisting license); Canella v. North Andover Fire Dept, 21 MCSR 266 (2008) (failure to obtain EMT certification); Britt v. Department of Public Health, 20 MCSR 364 (2007); cf. City of Attleboro v.
See also Town ofBrookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.
See also Town ofBrookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.
See also Town ofBrookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commission's jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Law enforcement officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct: "Police officers are not drafted into public service; rather they compete for their positions.
See also Town ofBrookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Even if the appointing authority did not meet the burden of proof for bypass on every reason given, its discretion must be upheld if any reason is sufficient, standing alone, to justify the bypass. There is no requirement that the appointing authority prove every reason.
See also Town ofBrookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.
See also Town ofBrookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.
Heavey, Houlihan, Kraft & Cardinal 229 Harvard Street Brookline, MA 02446 Respondents Attorney: Donnalyn B. Lynch Kahn, Esq. Associate City Solicitor City of Newton 1000 Commonwealth Avenue Newton Centre, MA 02459 Commissioner: Donald R. Marquis DECISION ON APPELLANTS MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER CHAPTER 310 OF THE ACTS OF 1993 Procedural Background Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Robert M.
Notis, Esq. 32 Kent Street Brookline MA 02445 Appearance for Respondent: T. David Houghton, Esq. 1st Assistant Town Attorney Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Commissioner: Paul M.