Sincerely, Carrie Benedon Assistant Attorney General Division of Open Government cc: Alicia Armes (via email: Gerry Mroz (via email: Danna Perry (via email: ) Craig Haller (via email: ) Megan Bridges, Esq., City Solicitor, City of Brockton (via email: Patricia Correa, Esq., First Assistant Town Counsel, Town of Brookline (via email: ) ) This determination was issued pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, 23(c).

Sincerely, Carrie Benedon Assistant Attorney General Division of Open Government cc: Alicia Armes (via email: Gerry Mroz (via email: Danna Perry (via email: ) Craig Haller (via email: ) Megan Bridges, Esq., City Solicitor, City of Brockton (via email: Patricia Correa, Esq., First Assistant Town Counsel, Town of Brookline (via email: ) ) This determination was issued pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, 23(c).

Town of Brookline, 53 Mass. App. Ct. 120 (2001) (the [DIA] judge erred as a mater of law by failing to give preclusive effect to the finding of a hearing officer for the Civil Service Commission in a prior proceeding that the town had just cause to discipline and then terminate the employee, where the issue of the towns bona fides with respect to personnel actions was identical in both proceedings.) HRDs argument that, since Ms.

See also Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.

Should the Appellant seek to revoke this dismissal at that time, the Commission will weigh MCADs decision appropriately while conducting further proceedings on the Appellants just-cause appeal, guided in part by the Supreme Judicial Courts framework outlined in Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021).

Should the Appellant seek to revoke this dismissal at that time, the Commission will weigh MCADs decision appropriately while conducting further proceedings on the Appellants just-cause appeal, guided in part by the Supreme Judicial Courts framework outlined in Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021).

Town of Brookline, 23 MCSR 749 (2010) (failure to obtain hoisting license); Canella v. North Andover Fire Dept, 21 MCSR 266 (2008) (failure to obtain EMT certification); Britt v. Department of Public Health, 20 MCSR 364 (2007); cf. City of Attleboro v.

See also Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Public safety officers are vested with considerable power and discretion and must be held to a high standard of conduct. See, e.g., Falmouth v. Civil Service Commn, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 801 (2004), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass. App.

See also Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). Analysis As a preliminary matter, DOC, as a criminal justice agency reviewing the application of a candidate for correction officer, is permitted to review and consider the Appellants sealed criminal record. As stated in Kodhimaj v.

See also Town of Brookline v. Alston, 487 Mass. 278 (2021) (analyzing broad scope of the Commissions jurisdiction to enforce basic merit principles under civil service law). ANALYSIS Quincy has established by a preponderance of the evidence that Firefighter Piccuito engaged in conduct that can reasonably be construed to raise a question about his suitability to assume the responsibilities of a QFD Fire Lieutenant.